Baroody Fuad M, Detineo Marcella, Naclerio Robert M
Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center and The Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Illinois.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013 Nov 1;115(9):1262-7. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00547.2013. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
We have previously shown that unilateral nasal challenge with antigen causes an increase in the number of eosinophils in the ipsilateral maxillary sinus. Here we aimed to determine whether there was an eosinophil response in the contralateral maxillary sinus after unilateral nasal challenge with antigen. Twenty subjects with a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis and a positive nasal challenge to ragweed or grass allergens were studied outside of their allergy season. Catheters were placed in both maxillary sinuses and the subjects were challenged with antigen via the left nostril. The subjects recorded nasal symptoms before and after each allergen challenge and hourly for 8 h afterward. We performed nasal lavages of the nose and sinuses at the same time as symptoms were recorded. The lavages were analyzed for the number of eosinophils and levels of albumin. Subjects showed a symptomatic response to challenge accompanied by an influx of eosinophils into the nose and increased vascular permeability. The number of eosinophils increased in both maxillary sinuses. The total change from diluent in eosinophils during the late phase response was higher in the ipsilateral maxillary sinus (median = 8,505; range = 0-100,360) compared with the contralateral sinus (median = 1,596; range = -13,527-93,373; P = 0.03). We conclude that eosinophils increase in both maxillary sinuses after unilateral nasal challenge. We speculate that a central neurologic reflex initiated in the nose by the nasal challenge contributes to the bilateral eosinophil response in the maxillary sinuses. We further speculate that, since there are more eosinophils in the ipsilateral compared with the contralateral maxillary sinus, there is also an axonal reflex into the ipsilateral maxillary sinus that contributed to the eosinophil response.
我们之前已经表明,用抗原进行单侧鼻腔激发会导致同侧上颌窦中嗜酸性粒细胞数量增加。在此,我们旨在确定在用抗原进行单侧鼻腔激发后,对侧上颌窦中是否存在嗜酸性粒细胞反应。对20名有季节性变应性鼻炎病史且对豚草或禾本科过敏原鼻腔激发试验呈阳性的受试者,在其过敏季节之外进行了研究。将导管置于双侧上颌窦中,通过左鼻孔用抗原对受试者进行激发。受试者在每次过敏原激发前后记录鼻腔症状,并在之后8小时内每小时记录一次。在记录症状的同时,我们对鼻腔和鼻窦进行了鼻腔灌洗。对灌洗液进行嗜酸性粒细胞数量和白蛋白水平分析。受试者对激发表现出症状反应,同时伴有嗜酸性粒细胞流入鼻腔和血管通透性增加。双侧上颌窦中嗜酸性粒细胞数量均增加。与对侧鼻窦(中位数 = 1596;范围 = -13527 - 93373;P = 0.03)相比,同侧上颌窦在迟发相反应期间嗜酸性粒细胞相对于稀释液的总变化更高(中位数 = 8505;范围 = 0 - 100360)。我们得出结论,单侧鼻腔激发后双侧上颌窦中嗜酸性粒细胞均增加。我们推测,鼻腔激发在鼻部引发的中枢神经反射促成了上颌窦中的双侧嗜酸性粒细胞反应。我们进一步推测,由于同侧上颌窦中的嗜酸性粒细胞比另一侧更多,还存在一条进入同侧上颌窦的轴突反射,这促成了嗜酸性粒细胞反应。