Lam T K, Lau H Y, Lee Y P, Fung S M, Leung W L, Kam K M
Microbiology Division, Public Health Laboratory Services Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong.
Int J STD AIDS. 2014 Jan;25(1):52-6. doi: 10.1177/0956462413491938. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
We studied the use of the INNO-LIA syphilis score assay in the resolution of discordant positive screening results of the Murex ICE Syphilis enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with the confirmatory results of both the Serodia Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) and the fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption (FTA-Abs) assays, for the serological diagnosis of syphilis. This was an observational study on the serum samples received by the Syphilis Laboratory, Hong Kong, during the period from January 2006 to December 2012. A total of 801 serum samples with discordant positive screening EIA results were used. Consensus results of such serum samples were derived from results of the EIA, TPPA and FTA-abs assays. The age range of the individuals was 14 to 104 years (median of 52). There were 369 males and 432 females. Of 378 serum samples, 139 showed agreement among positive results, 23 of 310 showed agreement among indeterminate results and 277 of 465 showed agreement among negative results. The proportions of agreement among positive, indeterminate and negative results were 0.37 (95% CI 0.32-0.42), 0.07 (95% CI 0.05-0.11) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.55-0.64), respectively; kappa 0.55 (95% CI 0.49-0.60). There were 60 serum samples with positive consensus results but negative INNO-LIA syphilis score results and 10 with negative consensus results but positive INNO-LIA syphilis score results. Although the INNO-LIA syphilis score assay can be considered a valid alternative confirmatory test for the serological diagnosis of syphilis, the present study showed that its use in the resolution of discordant positive screening EIA results was moderate. A more extensive characterization of serum samples with discordant reactive screening treponemal test results is necessary.
我们研究了INNO-LIA梅毒评分检测法在解决Murex ICE梅毒酶免疫测定(EIA)筛查结果呈阳性但与梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集试验(TPPA)和荧光密螺旋体抗体吸收试验(FTA-Abs)的确诊结果不一致的情况中的应用,以用于梅毒的血清学诊断。这是一项对香港梅毒实验室在2006年1月至2012年12月期间接收的血清样本进行的观察性研究。总共使用了801份筛查EIA结果呈阳性但不一致的血清样本。这些血清样本的一致结果源自EIA、TPPA和FTA-abs检测的结果。个体的年龄范围为14至104岁(中位数为52岁)。男性有369例,女性有432例。在378份血清样本中,139份在阳性结果上达成一致,310份中有23份在不确定结果上达成一致,465份中有277份在阴性结果上达成一致。阳性、不确定和阴性结果的一致比例分别为0.37(95%可信区间0.32 - 0.42)、0.07(95%可信区间0.05 - 0.11)和0.60(95%可信区间0.55 - 0.64);kappa值为0.55(95%可信区间0.49 - 0.60)。有60份血清样本的一致结果为阳性但INNO-LIA梅毒评分结果为阴性,10份血清样本的一致结果为阴性但INNO-LIA梅毒评分结果为阳性。尽管INNO-LIA梅毒评分检测法可被视为梅毒血清学诊断的一种有效的替代确诊检测方法,但本研究表明其在解决筛查EIA结果呈阳性但不一致的情况中的应用效果一般。有必要对梅毒螺旋体检测结果呈反应性但不一致的血清样本进行更广泛的特征描述。