• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的东亚患者中,通过不同血小板功能测试评估的氯吡格雷后血小板反应性对缺血事件的预测价值。

Predictive values of post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by different platelet function tests on ischemic events in East Asian patients treated with PCI.

作者信息

Zhang Hong-Zhe, Kim Moo Hyun, Jeong Young-Hoon

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Hospital , Busan , South Korea .

出版信息

Platelets. 2014;25(4):292-9. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2013.815341. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

DOI:10.3109/09537104.2013.815341
PMID:23971791
Abstract

Abstract An accumulating number of studies are revealing that platelet reactivity above specific cut-off scores leads to exponentially increased rates of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ischemic events. To evaluate the optimal predictive values for three different platelet function measurement assays of platelet reactivity on early clinical outcomes in Korean patients undergoing PCI, we enrolled 228 patients receiving clopidogrel prior to PCI. Platelet reactivity was measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA). The primary endpoint was the 30-day occurrence of ischemic events after PCI. MACE occurred in 36 patients (15.8%), including 35 patients (15.4%) with periprocedural MI and the death of one patient (0.4%). ADP-induced LTA and VerifyNow values (pre- and post-PCI) were significantly higher in patients with the subsequent occurrence of periprocedural MI, but the MEA assay data (PCI and post-PCI) displayed no significant differences (pre-PCI p=0.25 and post-PCI p=0.33). ROC curve analysis demonstrated HPR values for LTA (pre-PCI, >66% and post-PCI, >53 %, all p<0.001), VerifyNow (pre-PCI, >347 PRU and post-PCI >272 PRU, all p<0.001) and MEA (pre-PCI, >50 U and post-PCI >39 U, all p>0.05). The platelet reactivity measurements by LTA and the VerifyNow assay can discriminate the risk of 30-day ischemic events after PCI. The predictive cut-off values for adverse events are dependent on sampling time.

摘要

摘要 越来越多的研究表明,血小板反应性高于特定临界值会导致经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后缺血事件发生率呈指数级上升。为评估三种不同血小板功能检测方法对接受PCI的韩国患者早期临床结局中血小板反应性的最佳预测价值,我们纳入了228例在PCI前接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者。通过透光率聚集法(LTA)、VerifyNow P2Y12检测法和多电极血小板聚集法(MEA)测量血小板反应性。主要终点是PCI后30天缺血事件的发生情况。36例患者(15.8%)发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括35例(15.4%)围手术期心肌梗死患者和1例(0.4%)死亡患者。随后发生围手术期心肌梗死的患者中,ADP诱导的LTA和VerifyNow值(PCI前和PCI后)显著更高,但MEA检测数据(PCI时和PCI后)无显著差异(PCI前p = 0.25,PCI后p = 0.33)。ROC曲线分析显示,LTA的高血小板反应性(HPR)值(PCI前,>66%;PCI后,>53%,均p<0.001)、VerifyNow(PCI前,>347 PRU;PCI后>272 PRU,均p<0.001)和MEA(PCI前,>50 U;PCI后>39 U,均p>0.05)。通过LTA和VerifyNow检测法测量的血小板反应性可区分PCI后30天缺血事件的风险。不良事件的预测临界值取决于采样时间。

相似文献

1
Predictive values of post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by different platelet function tests on ischemic events in East Asian patients treated with PCI.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的东亚患者中,通过不同血小板功能测试评估的氯吡格雷后血小板反应性对缺血事件的预测价值。
Platelets. 2014;25(4):292-9. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2013.815341. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
2
Defining predictive values using three different platelet function tests for CYP2C19 phenotype status on maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI.使用三种不同的血小板功能测试来定义PCI术后维持双联抗血小板治疗中CYP2C19表型状态的预测值。
Platelets. 2014;25(4):285-91. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2013.815340. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
3
The effect of correcting VerifyNow P2Y12 assay results for hematocrit in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.校正经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者血细胞比容对 VerifyNow P2Y12 检测结果的影响。
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Apr;15(4):618-623. doi: 10.1111/jth.13642. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
4
Relationship Between Platelet Reactivity and Periprocedural Myonecrosis in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者血小板反应性与围手术期心肌坏死的关系
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Dec;31(12):E369-E375.
5
A therapeutic window for platelet reactivity for patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the ARMYDA-PROVE (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Platelet Reactivity for Outcome Validation Effort) study.择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的血小板反应性治疗窗口:ARMYDA-PROVE(抗血小板治疗减少血管成形术期间心肌损伤-血小板反应性以验证结果)研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Mar;5(3):281-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.01.009.
6
Point-of-care measurement of clopidogrel responsiveness predicts clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention results of the ARMYDA-PRO (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Platelet Reactivity Predicts Outcome) study.氯吡格雷反应性的床旁检测可预测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的临床结局:ARMYDA-PRO(血管成形术期间减少心肌损伤的抗血小板治疗 - 血小板反应性预测结局)研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Sep 30;52(14):1128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.038.
7
Response to antiplatelet therapy is independent of endogenous thrombin generation potential.抗血小板治疗反应独立于内源性凝血酶生成潜能。
Thromb Res. 2013 Jul;132(1):e24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
8
High post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay predicts long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary coronary stenting.采用床旁即时检验检测氯吡格雷抵抗可预测行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期临床结局。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):1877-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.154. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
9
Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the Stent Thrombosis In Belgium (STIB) trial.稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的血小板反应性与心血管事件:比利时支架血栓形成(STIB)试验
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):204-11. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I2A34.
10
Comparison of factors affecting platelet reactivity in various platelet function tests.比较不同血小板功能检测中影响血小板反应性的因素。
Platelets. 2019;30(5):631-636. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2018.1499887. Epub 2018 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in Optimal Platelet Reactivity after Potent P2Y12 Inhibitor Treatment in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者在强效P2Y12抑制剂治疗后最佳血小板反应性的差异。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 28;11(9):2480. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092480.
2
Safety and feasibility of low-dose ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.低剂量替格瑞洛在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的安全性和可行性。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Jan;44(1):123-128. doi: 10.1002/clc.23517. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
3
Lower Platelet Aggregation Is a Risk Factor for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-Associated Bleeding: A Preliminary Retrospective Study with Genotype Analysis.
血小板聚集率低是双联抗血小板治疗相关出血的危险因素:一项基于基因型分析的初步回顾性研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jun 16;26:e923758. doi: 10.12659/MSM.923758.
4
Both CYP2C19 and PON1 Q192R Genotypes Influence Platelet Response to Clopidogrel by Thrombelastography in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.CYP2C19 和 PON1 Q192R 基因型通过血栓弹力描记法影响急性冠状动脉综合征患者氯吡格雷的血小板反应。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2019 Jul 18;2019:3470145. doi: 10.1155/2019/3470145. eCollection 2019.
5
Half-dose ticagrelor versus high-dose clopidogrel in reducing platelet reactivity in acute coronary syndrome patients with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (divide study).替格瑞洛半量与高剂量氯吡格雷降低氯吡格雷高反应性急性冠脉综合征患者血小板反应性(DIVIDE 研究)。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;75(8):1059-1068. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02687-0. Epub 2019 May 12.
6
Comparison of VerifyNow P2Y12 and thrombelastography for assessing clopidogrel response in stroke patients in China.中国卒中患者中VerifyNow P2Y12检测与血栓弹力图在评估氯吡格雷反应方面的比较。
Neurol Sci. 2016 Feb;37(2):277-82. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2407-7. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
7
Lower loading dose of prasugrel compared with conventional loading doses of clopidogrel and prasugrel in korean patients undergoing elective coronary angiography: a randomized controlled study evaluating pharmacodynamic efficacy.在接受选择性冠状动脉造影的韩国患者中,与氯吡格雷和普拉格雷的传统负荷剂量相比,普拉格雷的负荷剂量较低:一项评估药效学疗效的随机对照研究。
Korean Circ J. 2014 Nov;44(6):386-93. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2014.44.6.386. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
8
"East asian paradox": challenge for the current antiplatelet strategy of "one-guideline-fits-all races" in acute coronary syndrome.“东亚悖论”:急性冠脉综合征“一种策略适合所有种族”的现行抗血小板策略的挑战。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 May;16(5):485. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0485-4.