Zhang Hong-Zhe, Kim Moo Hyun, Jeong Young-Hoon
Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Hospital , Busan , South Korea .
Platelets. 2014;25(4):292-9. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2013.815341. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
Abstract An accumulating number of studies are revealing that platelet reactivity above specific cut-off scores leads to exponentially increased rates of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ischemic events. To evaluate the optimal predictive values for three different platelet function measurement assays of platelet reactivity on early clinical outcomes in Korean patients undergoing PCI, we enrolled 228 patients receiving clopidogrel prior to PCI. Platelet reactivity was measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA). The primary endpoint was the 30-day occurrence of ischemic events after PCI. MACE occurred in 36 patients (15.8%), including 35 patients (15.4%) with periprocedural MI and the death of one patient (0.4%). ADP-induced LTA and VerifyNow values (pre- and post-PCI) were significantly higher in patients with the subsequent occurrence of periprocedural MI, but the MEA assay data (PCI and post-PCI) displayed no significant differences (pre-PCI p=0.25 and post-PCI p=0.33). ROC curve analysis demonstrated HPR values for LTA (pre-PCI, >66% and post-PCI, >53 %, all p<0.001), VerifyNow (pre-PCI, >347 PRU and post-PCI >272 PRU, all p<0.001) and MEA (pre-PCI, >50 U and post-PCI >39 U, all p>0.05). The platelet reactivity measurements by LTA and the VerifyNow assay can discriminate the risk of 30-day ischemic events after PCI. The predictive cut-off values for adverse events are dependent on sampling time.
摘要 越来越多的研究表明,血小板反应性高于特定临界值会导致经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后缺血事件发生率呈指数级上升。为评估三种不同血小板功能检测方法对接受PCI的韩国患者早期临床结局中血小板反应性的最佳预测价值,我们纳入了228例在PCI前接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者。通过透光率聚集法(LTA)、VerifyNow P2Y12检测法和多电极血小板聚集法(MEA)测量血小板反应性。主要终点是PCI后30天缺血事件的发生情况。36例患者(15.8%)发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括35例(15.4%)围手术期心肌梗死患者和1例(0.4%)死亡患者。随后发生围手术期心肌梗死的患者中,ADP诱导的LTA和VerifyNow值(PCI前和PCI后)显著更高,但MEA检测数据(PCI时和PCI后)无显著差异(PCI前p = 0.25,PCI后p = 0.33)。ROC曲线分析显示,LTA的高血小板反应性(HPR)值(PCI前,>66%;PCI后,>53%,均p<0.001)、VerifyNow(PCI前,>347 PRU;PCI后>272 PRU,均p<0.001)和MEA(PCI前,>50 U;PCI后>39 U,均p>0.05)。通过LTA和VerifyNow检测法测量的血小板反应性可区分PCI后30天缺血事件的风险。不良事件的预测临界值取决于采样时间。