• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保密保护与协作式护理在物质使用障碍治疗中的应用比较。

Confidentiality protections versus collaborative care in the treatment of substance use disorders.

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco at San Francisco General Hospital, Bldg 20, Ste, 2100, Rm 2127 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.

出版信息

Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2013 Aug 26;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1940-0640-8-13.

DOI:10.1186/1940-0640-8-13
PMID:23972141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3766245/
Abstract

Practitioners in federally-assisted substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs are faced with increasingly complex decisions when addressing patient confidentiality issues. Recent policy changes, intended to make treatment more available and accessible, are having an impact on delivery of SUD treatment in the United States. The addition of electronic health records provides opportunity for more rapid and comprehensive communication between patients' primary and SUD care providers while promoting a collaborative care environment. This shift toward collaborative care is complicated by the special protections that SUD documentation receives in SUD treatment programs, which vary depending on what care is provided and the setting where the patient is treated. This article explores the special protections for substance abuse documentation, discrepancies in treatment documentation, ways to deal with these issues in clinical practice, and the need for more knowledge about how to harmonize treatment in the SUD and primary care systems.

摘要

在应对患者保密问题时,联邦资助的物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗项目的从业者面临着越来越复杂的决策。最近的政策变化旨在使治疗更加普及和便捷,这对美国的 SUD 治疗服务产生了影响。电子健康记录的增加为患者的初级保健和 SUD 护理提供者之间提供了更快速和全面的沟通机会,同时促进了协作式护理环境。这种向协作式护理的转变因 SUD 治疗计划中 SUD 文档所获得的特殊保护而变得复杂,这些特殊保护因所提供的护理以及患者接受治疗的环境而异。本文探讨了物质滥用文档的特殊保护、治疗文档中的差异、在临床实践中处理这些问题的方法,以及对如何协调 SUD 和初级保健系统治疗的更多了解的需求。

相似文献

1
Confidentiality protections versus collaborative care in the treatment of substance use disorders.保密保护与协作式护理在物质使用障碍治疗中的应用比较。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2013 Aug 26;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1940-0640-8-13.
2
Navigating the legal and ethical foundations of informed consent and confidentiality in integrated primary care.在综合初级保健中探寻知情同意和保密的法律与伦理基础。
Fam Syst Health. 2013 Mar;31(1):9-19. doi: 10.1037/a0031974.
3
Health information privacy and health information technology in the US correctional setting.美国惩教环境中的健康信息隐私和健康信息技术。
Am J Public Health. 2014 May;104(5):803-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301845. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
4
The California Integration Learning Collaborative: a forum to address challenges of SUD-primary care service integration.加利福尼亚整合学习协作组:一个解决物质使用障碍与初级保健服务整合问题的论坛。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2012 Sep-Oct;44(4):285-91. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2012.718637.
5
Social workers have an obligation to all patients regarding confidentiality … however, for some patients, the obligation is greater.社会工作者对所有患者都负有保密义务……然而,对于一些患者来说,这种义务更为重大。
Soc Work Health Care. 2017 Oct;56(9):779-793. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2017.1343216. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
6
Privacy and health information technology.隐私与健康信息技术。
J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Fall;37 Suppl 2:121-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00424.x.
7
No. 18-251 In The Supreme Court of the United States.美国最高法院第18 - 251号案件
J Leg Med. 2019 Jul-Sep;39(3):299-334. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2019.1653715.
8
Breaking down the federal and state barriers preventing the implementation of accurate, reliable and cost effective electronic health records.打破阻碍实施准确、可靠且具成本效益的电子健康记录的联邦和州级障碍。
Ann Health Law. 2010;19(1 Spec No):205-11.
9
A new age for mental and substance abuse health records. Considerations for protecting highly sensitive records in electronic systems.精神与药物滥用健康记录的新时代。关于在电子系统中保护高度敏感记录的考量。
J AHIMA. 2012 Apr;83(4):42-3.
10
Focus on electronic health records. 'HIPAA2' legislation means more delicate handling of data.关注电子健康记录。《健康保险流通与责任法案2》立法意味着要更谨慎地处理数据。
Nat Med. 2010 Mar;16(3):250. doi: 10.1038/nm0310-250a.

引用本文的文献

1
A learning health system model for addressing substance use: Denver Health Center for Addiction Medicine.一种用于解决药物使用问题的学习型健康系统模型:丹佛健康成瘾医学中心。
Learn Health Syst. 2025 Mar 27;9(3):e70003. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.70003. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Improving diagnosis-based quality measures: an application of machine learning to the prediction of substance use disorder among outpatients.提高基于诊断的质量指标:机器学习在门诊患者物质使用障碍预测中的应用。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Mar 22;14(1):e003017. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003017.
3
Strategies to recruit rural primary care providers to implement a medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) focused integrated care model.招募农村初级保健提供者以实施专注于阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗(MOUD)的综合护理模式的策略。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Feb 19;4:26334895231152808. doi: 10.1177/26334895231152808. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
A scoping review of barriers and facilitators to the integration of substance use treatment services into US mainstream health care.对美国将药物使用治疗服务纳入主流医疗保健的障碍和促进因素的范围审查。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2023 Mar 24;7:100152. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100152. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Outpatient follow-up and use of medications for opioid use disorder after residential treatment among Medicaid enrollees in 10 states.10 个州医疗补助计划参保者经住院治疗后门诊随访和阿片类药物使用障碍药物使用情况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Dec 1;241:109670. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109670. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
Recommendations to Inform Substance Use Disorder Data Sharing Research: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis.建议告知物质使用障碍数据共享研究:范围审查和主题分析。
J Addict Med. 2022;16(3):261-271. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000893.
7
The Affordable Care Act: an opportunity for improving care for substance use disorders?《平价医疗法案》:改善物质使用障碍治疗的契机?
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Mar 1;66(3):310-2. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400159. Epub 2014 Dec 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic health records: essential tools in integrating substance abuse treatment with primary care.电子健康记录:将药物滥用治疗与初级保健相结合的重要工具。
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2012 Feb 1;3:1-8. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S22575. eCollection 2012.
2
Integrating information on substance use disorders into electronic health record systems.将物质使用障碍相关信息整合到电子健康记录系统中。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Jul;43(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
3
Priorities for policy research on treatments for alcohol and drug use disorders.治疗酒精和药物使用障碍的政策研究优先事项。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Sep;39(2):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
4
Confidentiality law: time for change?保密法:是时候变革了吗?
Behav Healthc. 2010 Apr;30(4):11-3.
5
Openness of patients' reporting with use of electronic records: psychiatric clinicians' views.患者使用电子病历报告的开放性:精神科临床医生的观点。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):54-60. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3341.
6
The 42 CFR Part 2 and NHIN conundrum.《联邦法规汇编》第42编第2部分与国家卫生信息网络难题。
Behav Healthc. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(7):52-3.
7
Reforming the HIPAA Privacy Rule: safeguarding privacy and promoting research.改革《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私规则:保护隐私并促进研究。
JAMA. 2009 Apr 1;301(13):1373-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.424.
8
Crossed wires: how yesterday's privacy rules might undercut tomorrow's nationwide health information network.交叉线:昨天的隐私规则如何削弱明天的全国性健康信息网络
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):450-2. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.450.
9
Protecting patients in health information exchange: a defense of the HIPAA privacy rule.保护健康信息交换中的患者:对 HIPAA 隐私规则的辩护。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):447-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.447.
10
Privacy as an enabler, not an impediment: building trust into health information exchange.将隐私作为促进因素,而非障碍:在健康信息交换中建立信任。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):416-27. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.416.