Suppr超能文献

全野同步整合加量容积调强放疗与调强放疗在鼻咽癌治疗中的比较

Comparison of whole-field simultaneous integrated boost VMAT and IMRT in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer.

作者信息

Jin Xiance, Yi Jinling, Zhou Yongqiang, Yan Huawei, Han Ce, Xie Congying

机构信息

Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China.

出版信息

Med Dosim. 2013 Winter;38(4):418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

Abstract

To study the feasibility of using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to deliver whole-field simultaneous integrated boost (WF-SIB) to treat patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). WF-SIB intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans, one-arc WF-SIB VMAT plans, and two-arc WF-SIB VMAT plans were generated with identical objective functions for 8 patients with NPC of various stages. Isodose distributions and dose-volume histograms were evaluated. Dosimetric and biological quality indices of clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were calculated to study the optimization capability of these 3 modalities in the treatment of patients with NPC. The optimization time, delivery time, required monitor units (MUs), and delivery accuracy were also compared to investigate the feasibility of these 3 modalities. There was no significant difference (p = 0.92) in target coverage (TC) between WF-SIB IMRT (99.00 ± 0.79) and two-arc WF-SIB VMAT (97.98 ± 1.29). However, both had higher TC than one-arc VMAT plans (89.92 ± 6.32, p < 0.01). IMRT demonstrated the best protection of the spinal cord, whereas two-arc VMAT showed the minimum Dmax to OARs. No other significant differences were observed among these 3 modalities on CTV coverage and OAR sparing. The delivery and MU efficiency of one-arc and two-arc WF-SIB VMAT were greatly improved compared with WF-SIB IMRT. The optimization time of one-arc and two-arc WF-SIB VMAT plans were 5 and 10 times greater than that of WF-SIB IMRT, respectively. The delivery accuracy of WF-SIB VMAT was not affected by the increased freedom. For patients with NPC, one-arc WF-SIB VMAT might not be able to achieve sufficient TC, whereas two-arc WF-SIB VMAT was able to achieve reasonable TC. No significant advantage on OAR protection was demonstrated by VMAT compared with IMRT. WF-SIB VMAT has significantly shorter delivery times, but WF-SIB IMRT may still be the first treatment choice for patients with NPC.

摘要

研究采用容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)实施全野同步整合加量(WF-SIB)治疗鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的可行性。为8例不同分期的NPC患者生成具有相同目标函数的WF-SIB调强放疗(IMRT)计划、单弧WF-SIB VMAT计划和双弧WF-SIB VMAT计划。评估等剂量分布和剂量体积直方图。计算临床靶区(CTV)和危及器官(OARs)的剂量学和生物学质量指标,以研究这三种模式在NPC患者治疗中的优化能力。还比较了优化时间、照射时间、所需监测单位(MU)和照射精度,以探讨这三种模式的可行性。WF-SIB IMRT(99.00±0.79)与双弧WF-SIB VMAT(97.98±1.29)之间的靶区覆盖(TC)无显著差异(p = 0.92)。然而,两者的TC均高于单弧VMAT计划(89.92±6.32,p < 0.01)。IMRT对脊髓的保护效果最佳,而双弧VMAT对OARs的Dmax最小。在CTV覆盖和OAR保护方面,这三种模式之间未观察到其他显著差异。与WF-SIB IMRT相比,单弧和双弧WF-SIB VMAT的照射和MU效率有了很大提高。单弧和双弧WF-SIB VMAT计划的优化时间分别比WF-SIB IMRT长5倍和10倍。WF-SIB VMAT的照射精度不受自由度增加的影响。对于NPC患者,单弧WF-SIB VMAT可能无法实现足够的TC,而双弧WF-SIB VMAT能够实现合理的TC。与IMRT相比,VMAT在OAR保护方面未显示出显著优势。WF-SIB VMAT的照射时间明显更短,但WF-SIB IMRT可能仍然是NPC患者的首选治疗方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验