Endocrine Surgery Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Surgery. 2013 Dec;154(6):1263-71; discussion 1271. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.029. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
Hurthle cell carcinoma (HCC) of the thyroid is a variant of follicular cell carcinoma (FCC). A low incidence and lack of long-term follow-up data have caused controversy regarding the survival characteristics of HCC. We aimed to clarify this controversy by analyzing HCC survival over a 35-year period using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
Cases of HCC and FCC were extracted from the SEER-9 database (1975-2009). Five- and 10-year survival rates were calculated. We compared changes in survival over time by grouping cases into 5-year intervals.
We identified 1,416 cases of HCC and 4,973 cases of FCC. For cases diagnosed from 1975 to 1979, HCC showed a worse survival compared with FCC (5 years, 75%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 60.2-85) versus 88.7% (95% CI, 86-90.8; 10 years, 66.7% [95% CI, 51.5-78.1] vs. 79.7% [95% CI, 76.5-82.6]). For cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2004 we found no difference in 5-year survival between HCC and FCC (91.1% [95% CI, 87.6-93.7] vs. 89.1% [95% CI, 86.5-91.2]). For cases diagnosed from 1995 to 1999, there was no difference in 10-year survival between HCC and FCC (80.9% [95% CI, 75.6-85.2] vs. 83.9% [95% CI, 80.8-86.6]). HCC survival improved over the study period while FCC survival rates remained stable (increase in survival at 5 years, 21.7% vs. 0.4%; at 10 years, 21.3% vs. 5.2%). Improvement in HCC survival was observed for both genders, in age ≥45 years, in local and regional disease, for tumors >4 cm, and with white race.
HCC survival has improved dramatically over time such that HCC and FCC survival rates are now the same. These findings explain how studies over the last 4 decades have shown conflicting results regarding HCC survival; however, our data do not explain why HCC survival has improved.
甲状腺 Hurthle 细胞癌(HCC)是滤泡细胞癌(FCC)的一种变体。由于发病率低且缺乏长期随访数据,HCC 的生存特征一直存在争议。我们旨在通过使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析 35 年来 HCC 的生存情况来阐明这一争议。
从 SEER-9 数据库(1975-2009 年)中提取 HCC 和 FCC 病例。计算 5 年和 10 年生存率。我们通过将病例分为 5 年间隔来比较随时间变化的生存率变化。
我们确定了 1416 例 HCC 和 4973 例 FCC。对于 1975 年至 1979 年诊断的病例,与 FCC 相比,HCC 的生存率较差(5 年,75%;95%置信区间[CI],60.2-85)与 88.7%(95% CI,86-90.8;10 年,66.7%[95% CI,51.5-78.1]与 79.7%[95% CI,76.5-82.6])。对于 2000 年至 2004 年诊断的病例,我们没有发现 HCC 和 FCC 在 5 年生存率上有差异(91.1%[95% CI,87.6-93.7]与 89.1%[95% CI,86.5-91.2])。对于 1995 年至 1999 年诊断的病例,HCC 和 FCC 在 10 年生存率上没有差异(80.9%[95% CI,75.6-85.2]与 83.9%[95% CI,80.8-86.6])。HCC 的生存率在研究期间有所提高,而 FCC 的生存率保持稳定(5 年生存率提高 21.7%对 0.4%;10 年生存率提高 21.3%对 5.2%)。在两性、年龄≥45 岁、局部和区域疾病、肿瘤>4cm 以及白人种族中,HCC 的生存率都有所提高。
HCC 的生存率随着时间的推移显著提高,以至于 HCC 和 FCC 的生存率现在相同。这些发现解释了为什么过去 40 年的研究显示 HCC 生存率存在相互矛盾的结果;然而,我们的数据并不能解释为什么 HCC 的生存率有所提高。