Suppr超能文献

肝包膜下位置肝细胞癌的一线射频消融联合或不联合人工腹水治疗:长期随访的局部控制率和腹膜种植风险。

First-line radiofrequency ablation with or without artificial ascites for hepatocellular carcinomas in a subcapsular location: local control rate and risk of peritoneal seeding at long-term follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2013 Dec;68(12):e641-51. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the long-term local control of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and risk of peritoneal seeding via percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using artificial ascites with those of RFA without artificial ascites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study. From April 2005 to February 2008, 160 patients (121 men, 39 women; age range 36-79 years) with a single subcapsular HCC (mean size 2.19 cm) were treated with ultrasonography-guided percutaneous RFA as a first-line therapy. Forty-four patients were treated with RFA using artificial ascites, whereas the other 116 patients were treated without artificial ascites. The cumulative local tumour progression (LTP) and peritoneal seeding were compared in both groups using follow-up computed tomography (CT). Cumulative LTP rates were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Risk of peritoneal seeding was investigated by means of multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The overall median follow-up period was 52.5 months (range 13-76 months). The 1, 2, 4, and 6 year cumulative LTP rates were 17.1, 27.6, 35.2, and 35.2%, respectively, in the group with artificial ascites, and 8, 15.2, 26.6, and 34.4% in the group without artificial ascites, without significant difference (p = 0.332). The rates of peritoneal seeding were 6.8% (3/44) in the group with artificial ascites and 2.6% (3/116) in the group without artificial ascites, a non-significant difference (p = 0.347). The biopsy prior to RFA was the independent risk factor of peritoneal seeding regardless of the use of artificial ascites.

CONCLUSION

Long-term local tumour control and risk of peritoneal seeding were comparable for RFA with or without artificial ascites when used as a first-line therapy for subcapsular HCC.

摘要

目的

比较经皮射频消融(RFA)联合人工腹水与单纯 RFA 治疗肝包膜下 HCC 的局部肿瘤控制率及腹膜种植风险。

材料与方法

本研究经医院伦理委员会批准。2005 年 4 月至 2008 年 2 月,160 例(男 121 例,女 39 例;年龄 36-79 岁)单发肝包膜下 HCC 患者接受超声引导下经皮 RFA 治疗。其中 44 例采用 RFA 联合人工腹水,116 例采用单纯 RFA。通过随访 CT 比较两组患者的累积局部肿瘤进展(LTP)和腹膜种植情况。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和 Log-rank 检验分析累积 LTP 率,采用多因素分析探讨腹膜种植的风险因素。

结果

所有患者中位随访时间为 52.5 个月(13-76 个月)。联合人工腹水组 1、2、4、6 年累积 LTP 率分别为 17.1%、27.6%、35.2%和 35.2%,单纯 RFA 组分别为 8%、15.2%、26.6%和 34.4%,两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.332)。联合人工腹水组腹膜种植率为 6.8%(3/44),单纯 RFA 组为 2.6%(3/116),两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.347)。RFA 治疗前活检是腹膜种植的独立危险因素,与是否使用人工腹水无关。

结论

作为肝包膜下 HCC 的一线治疗方法,RFA 联合或不联合人工腹水的局部肿瘤控制率和腹膜种植风险相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验