Suppr超能文献

美国门诊环境下培美曲塞联合铂类一线治疗与其他方案治疗非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者的成本效果比较。

Cost effectiveness of first-line pemetrexed plus platinum compared with other regimens in the treatment of patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in the US outpatient setting.

机构信息

Xcenda, 4114 Woodlands Parkway, Palm Harbor, FL 34685, USA.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2013 Oct;82(1):121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.07.021. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

Abstract

This retrospective observational study evaluated cost effectiveness of first-line treatment of advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with pemetrexed/platinum (Pem/Plat) relative to paclitaxel/carboplatin (Pac/Carbo) and paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab (Pac/Carbo/Bev). Patients initiating first-line treatment from 2006 to 2009 were identified in electronic medical records of 20 US oncology practices. Pem/Plat patients were matched 1:1 on important characteristics with Pac/Carbo and Pac/Carbo/Bev patients and followed for 1 year to assess progression, survival, and costs. Bootstrapping was used to calculate the probability of falling within quadrants of the incremental cost-effectiveness plane. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling were also performed. Three hundred Pem/Plat patients (mean age, 67.6 years; male, 56.0%; PS 0/1, 71.0%) were matched with 300 patients in the other cohorts. Median PFS was 134 days (Pem/Plat) versus 106 days (Pac/Carbo) (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67, P < 0.001) and 126 days (Pac/Carbo/Bev) (HR: 0.68, P < 0.001). Median OS was 298 days (Pem/Plat) versus 218 days (Pac/Carbo) (HR: 0.88, P = 0.08) and 271 days (Pac/Carbo/Bev) (HR: 0.93, P = 0.31). Pem/Plat therapy costs were higher versus Pac/Carbo ($21,841 higher PFS; $19,137 higher OS; P ≤ 0.05) and lower versus Pac/Carbo/Bev ($15,160 lower PFS; $19,946 lower OS; P ≤ 0.05). Pem/Plat had a greater probability of higher costs/higher effectiveness versus Pac/Carbo (PFS, 90.1%; OS, 96.3%) and lower costs/higher effectiveness versus Pac/Carbo/Bev (PFS, 69.5%; OS, 85.0%). Pem/Plat had higher cost and effectiveness than Pac/Carbo; depending on a payer's or society's willingness to pay, Pem/Plat may be considered cost effective compared with Pac/Carbo. Pem/Plat yielded greater effectiveness with lower costs than Pac/Carbo/Bev.

摘要

这项回顾性观察研究评估了培美曲塞/铂(Pem/Plat)一线治疗晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的成本效果,与紫杉醇/卡铂(Pac/Carbo)和紫杉醇/卡铂/贝伐单抗(Pac/Carbo/Bev)相比。从 20 家美国肿瘤学实践的电子病历中确定了 2006 年至 2009 年开始一线治疗的患者。将培美曲塞/铂患者与紫杉醇/卡铂和紫杉醇/卡铂/贝伐单抗患者按重要特征进行 1:1 匹配,并随访 1 年以评估进展、生存和成本。使用自举法计算增量成本效果平面象限内的概率。还进行了 Kaplan-Meier 分析和 Cox 比例风险回归模型。300 名培美曲塞/铂患者(平均年龄 67.6 岁;男性 56.0%;PS 0/1,71.0%)与其他两组的 300 名患者相匹配。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 134 天(培美曲塞/铂)与 106 天(紫杉醇/卡铂)(风险比[HR]:0.67,P<0.001)和 126 天(紫杉醇/卡铂/贝伐单抗)(HR:0.68,P<0.001)。中位总生存期(OS)为 298 天(培美曲塞/铂)与 218 天(紫杉醇/卡铂)(HR:0.88,P=0.08)和 271 天(紫杉醇/卡铂/贝伐单抗)(HR:0.93,P=0.31)。与紫杉醇/卡铂相比,培美曲塞/铂治疗的成本更高(PFS 高 21841 美元;OS 高 19137 美元;P≤0.05),与紫杉醇/卡铂/贝伐单抗相比,成本更低(PFS 低 15160 美元;OS 低 19946 美元;P≤0.05)。与紫杉醇/卡铂相比,培美曲塞/铂具有更高的成本/更高的效果(PFS,90.1%;OS,96.3%),与紫杉醇/卡铂/贝伐单抗相比,成本更低/效果更高(PFS,69.5%;OS,85.0%)。培美曲塞/铂的成本和效果均高于紫杉醇/卡铂;取决于支付者或社会的支付意愿,培美曲塞/铂可能比紫杉醇/卡铂更具成本效益。与紫杉醇/卡铂/贝伐单抗相比,培美曲塞/铂具有更低的成本和更高的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验