Suppr超能文献

非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、指南目标及 130 万成年人二级预防中的人群百分位数:VLDL-2 研究(非常大的脂质数据库)。

Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, guideline targets, and population percentiles for secondary prevention in 1.3 million adults: the VLDL-2 study (very large database of lipids).

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, Maryland.

Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 19;62(21):1960-1965. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.045. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to examine patient-level discordance between population percentiles of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).

BACKGROUND

Non-HDL-C is an alternative to LDL-C for risk stratification and lipid-lowering therapy. The justification for the present guideline-based non-HDL-C cutpoints of 30 mg/dl higher than the LDL-C cutpoints remains largely untested.

METHODS

We assigned population percentiles to non-HDL-C and Friedewald-estimated LDL-C values of 1,310,440 U.S. adults with triglyceride levels <400 mg/dl who underwent lipid testing by vertical spin density gradient ultracentrifugation (Atherotech, Birmingham, Alabama) from 2009 to 2011.

RESULTS

LDL-C cutpoints of 70, 100, 130, 160, and 190 mg/dl were in the same population percentiles as non-HDL-C values of 93, 125, 157, 190, and 223 mg/dl, respectively. Non-HDL-C values reclassified a significant proportion of patients within or to a higher treatment category compared with Friedewald LDL-C values, especially at LDL-C levels in the treatment range of high-risk patients and at triglyceride levels ≥150 mg/dl. Of patients with LDL-C levels <70 mg/dl, 15% had a non-HDL-C level ≥ 100 mg/dl (guideline-based cutpoint) and 25% had a non-HDL-C level ≥ 93 mg/dl (percentile-based cutpoint); if triglyceride levels were 150 to 199 mg/dl concurrently, these values were 22% and 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant patient-level discordance between non-HDL-C and LDL-C percentiles at lower LDL-C and higher triglyceride levels, which has implications for the treatment of high-risk patients. Current non-HDL-C cutpoints for high-risk patients may need to be lowered to match percentiles of LDL-C cutpoints. Relatively small absolute reductions in non-HDL-C cutpoints result in substantial reclassification of patients to higher treatment categories with potential implications for risk assessment and treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(非 HDL-C)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)人群百分位之间的患者水平差异。

背景

非 HDL-C 是用于风险分层和降脂治疗的 LDL-C 的替代指标。目前基于指南的非 HDL-C 切点比 LDL-C 切点高 30mg/dl 的合理性在很大程度上仍未经检验。

方法

我们将人群百分位分配给 2009 年至 2011 年期间通过垂直旋转密度梯度超速离心法(阿拉巴马州伯明翰市的 Atherotech)进行血脂检测的 131 万 440 名美国成年人的非 HDL-C 和 Friedewald 估计的 LDL-C 值,这些成年人的甘油三酯水平<400mg/dl。

结果

LDL-C 切点为 70、100、130、160 和 190mg/dl,分别与非 HDL-C 值为 93、125、157、190 和 223mg/dl 的人群百分位相同。与 Friedewald LDL-C 值相比,非 HDL-C 值重新分类了相当一部分患者处于或更高的治疗类别,尤其是在高危患者的 LDL-C 治疗范围内和甘油三酯水平≥150mg/dl 时。在 LDL-C 水平<70mg/dl 的患者中,15%的非 HDL-C 水平≥100mg/dl(基于指南的切点),25%的非 HDL-C 水平≥93mg/dl(基于百分位的切点);如果同时甘油三酯水平为 150-199mg/dl,这些值分别为 22%和 50%。

结论

在 LDL-C 水平较低和甘油三酯水平较高时,非 HDL-C 和 LDL-C 百分位之间存在显著的患者水平差异,这对高危患者的治疗有影响。目前高危患者的非 HDL-C 切点可能需要降低,以匹配 LDL-C 切点的百分位。非 HDL-C 切点的相对较小的绝对降低导致大量患者重新分类为更高的治疗类别,这可能对风险评估和治疗产生影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验