Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Clinical Core Laboratory Services, Department LDL C Values of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Clin Lipidol. 2017 Jul-Aug;11(4):1065-1072. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
A number of national and international guidelines recommend treatment to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL. Comparing the performance of the Friedewald and a novel LDL-C estimate at these concentrations in a nationally representative and clinical cohorts can inform best practices.
The objectives of the study were to evaluate concordance between Friedewald-estimated LDL-C and novel-estimated LDL-C and compare with other atherogenic parameters when the estimated LDL-C is <70 mg/dL.
Atherogenic lipid parameters were assessed in a cross-sectional analysis among participants with a Friedewald-estimated LDL-C <70 mg/dL from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2012 (n = 334), Johns Hopkins (n = 896), and Mayo Clinic (n = 1151). Novel LDL-C was estimated using an individualized factor to account for heterogeneity in the triglyceride to very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio. Participants were classified as concordant if their LDL-C was <70 mg/dL by both equations and discordant if ≥70 mg/dL by the novel equation.
Among NHANES participants not on statin therapy, 10% had LDL-C <70 mg/dL by both the Friedewald and novel equations. Overall, 15% of participants from NHANES, 20% from Johns Hopkins, and 20% from Mayo Clinic had discordant LDL-C values. In all 3 cohorts, nearly one-fourth of participants in the discordant group had an LDL-C estimate of ≥80 mg/dL (ie, ≥10 mg/dL higher) by the novel equation. Compared with the concordant group, the discordant group had significantly higher median concentrations of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; 101-104 mg/dL vs 74-79 mg/dL) and apolipoprotein B (apoB; 65-72 mg/dL vs 47-57 mg/dL). In NHANES, wherein statins use was recorded, a similarly higher atherogenic burden by non-HDL-C and apoB levels was observed on and off statin therapy in the discordant group.
In a nationally representative sample, a hospital laboratory, and a reference laboratory, approximately one-fifth of individuals with Friedewald-estimated LDL-C <70 mg/dL have a value ≥70 mg/dL using the novel LDL-C equation. These individuals also have significantly higher non-HDL-C and apoB concentrations, conferring an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Accordingly, ongoing use of Friedewald estimation may lead to the misclassification of high-risk individuals and subsequent under-utilization of lipid-lowering therapies. Further investigations are necessary to confirm these findings in patients using proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors.
许多国家和国际指南建议将低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)<70mg/dL 的患者作为治疗目标。在全国代表性和临床队列中比较 Friedewald 估计的 LDL-C 和新型 LDL-C 估计在这些浓度下的性能,可以为最佳实践提供信息。
本研究的目的是评估在 Friedewald 估计的 LDL-C<70mg/dL 时,新型 LDL-C 估计与 Friedewald 估计之间的一致性,并与其他致动脉粥样硬化参数进行比较。
使用个性化因子估计新型 LDL-C,以解释甘油三酯与极低密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值的异质性,在来自全国健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)2011-2012 年(n=334)、约翰霍普金斯(n=896)和梅奥诊所(n=1151)的 Friedewald 估计 LDL-C<70mg/dL 的参与者中进行横断面分析。新型 LDL-C 方程估计 LDL-C<70mg/dL 的参与者为一致,新型 LDL-C 方程估计 LDL-C≥70mg/dL 的参与者为不一致。
在未服用他汀类药物的 NHANES 参与者中,有 10%的患者同时使用两种方程估计 LDL-C<70mg/dL。总体而言,NHANES 参与者中有 15%、约翰霍普金斯参与者中有 20%、梅奥诊所参与者中有 20%的 LDL-C 值不一致。在所有 3 个队列中,几乎四分之一的不一致组参与者的新型 LDL-C 估计值≥80mg/dL(即高出≥10mg/dL)。与一致组相比,不一致组的非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C;101-104mg/dL 比 74-79mg/dL)和载脂蛋白 B(apoB;65-72mg/dL 比 47-57mg/dL)的中位数浓度明显更高。在 NHANES 中,记录了他汀类药物的使用情况,在他汀类药物治疗和未治疗的不一致组中,非 HDL-C 和 apoB 水平的致动脉粥样硬化负担也明显更高。
在全国代表性样本、医院实验室和参考实验室中,约五分之一的 Friedewald 估计 LDL-C<70mg/dL 的个体使用新型 LDL-C 方程估计值≥70mg/dL。这些个体的非 HDL-C 和 apoB 浓度也明显更高,这增加了患心血管疾病的风险。因此,持续使用 Friedewald 估计可能导致高危个体的错误分类和随后降脂治疗的使用不足。需要进一步的研究来证实这些在使用前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素 9 抑制剂的患者中的发现。