Deurveilher Samuel, Ryan Nathan, Burns Joan, Semba Kazue
Department of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Nov 1;256:238-49. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.029. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
People often sleep deprive themselves voluntarily for social and lifestyle reasons. Animals also appear to stay awake longer as a result of their natural curiosity to explore novel environments and interact socially with conspecifics. Although multiple arousal systems in the brain are known to act jointly to promote and maintain wakefulness, it remains unclear whether these systems are similarly engaged during voluntary vs. forced wakefulness. Using c-Fos immunohistochemistry, we compared neuronal responses in rats deprived of sleep for 2 h by gentle sensory stimulation, exploration under social isolation, or exploration with social interaction, and rats under undisturbed control conditions. In many arousal, limbic, and autonomic nuclei examined (e.g., anterior cingulate cortex and locus coeruleus), the two sleep deprivation procedures involving exploration were similarly effective, and both were more effective than sleep deprivation with sensory stimulation, in increasing the number of c-Fos immunoreactive neurons. However, some nuclei (e.g., paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus and select amygdala nuclei) were more responsive to exploration with social interaction, while others (e.g., histaminergic tuberomammillary nucleus) responded more strongly to exploration in social isolation. In the rostral basal forebrain, cholinergic and GABAergic neurons responded preferentially to exploration with social interaction, whereas resident neurons in general responded most strongly to exploration without social interaction. These results indicate that voluntary exploration with/without social interaction is more effective than forced sleep deprivation with gentle sensory stimulation for inducing c-Fos in arousal and limbic/autonomic brain regions, and suggest that these nuclei participate in different aspects of arousal during sustained voluntary wakefulness.
人们常常出于社交和生活方式的原因自愿剥夺自己的睡眠。动物似乎也会由于对探索新环境和与同类进行社交互动的天然好奇心而保持更长时间的清醒。虽然已知大脑中的多个唤醒系统共同作用以促进和维持清醒状态,但尚不清楚这些系统在自愿清醒与被迫清醒期间是否同样活跃。我们使用c-Fos免疫组织化学方法,比较了通过轻柔感觉刺激剥夺睡眠2小时、在社会隔离状态下探索或在社会互动中探索的大鼠,以及处于未受干扰的对照条件下的大鼠的神经元反应。在许多被检查的唤醒、边缘和自主神经核(例如前扣带回皮质和蓝斑)中,涉及探索的两种睡眠剥夺程序同样有效,并且在增加c-Fos免疫反应性神经元数量方面,两者都比感觉刺激剥夺睡眠更有效。然而,一些核(例如下丘脑室旁核和特定的杏仁核)对社会互动中的探索反应更强,而其他一些核(例如组胺能结节乳头体核)对社会隔离中的探索反应更强烈。在吻侧基底前脑,胆碱能和GABA能神经元优先对社会互动中的探索做出反应,而常驻神经元总体上对无社会互动的探索反应最强。这些结果表明,在唤醒和边缘/自主脑区诱导c-Fos方面,有/无社会互动的自愿探索比轻柔感觉刺激的被迫睡眠剥夺更有效,并表明这些核在持续自愿清醒期间参与唤醒的不同方面。