School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 15;129:283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.032. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
Gentle Remediation Options (GRO) are risk management strategies or techniques for contaminated sites that result in no gross reduction in soil functionality (or a net gain) as well as risk management. Intelligently applied GROs can provide: (a) rapid risk management via pathway control, through containment and stabilisation, coupled with a longer term removal or immobilisation/isolation of the contaminant source term; and (b) a range of additional economic (e.g. biomass generation), social (e.g. leisure and recreation) and environmental (e.g. CO2 sequestration) benefits. In order for these benefits to be optimised or indeed realised, effective stakeholder engagement is required. This paper reviews current sector practice in stakeholder engagement and its importance when implementing GRO and other remediation options. From this, knowledge gaps are identified, and strategies to promote more effective stakeholder engagement during GRO application are outlined. Further work is required on integrating stakeholder engagement strategies into decision support systems and tools for GRO (to raise the profile of the benefits of effective stakeholder engagement and participation, particularly with sector professionals), and developing criteria for the identification of different stakeholder profiles/categories. Demonstrator sites can make a significant contribution to stakeholder engagement via providing evidence on the effectiveness of GRO under varying site contexts and conditions. Effective and sustained engagement strategies however will be required to ensure that site risk is effectively managed over the longer-term, and that full potential benefits of GRO (e.g. CO2 sequestration, economic returns from biomass generation and "leverage" of marginal land, amenity and educational value, ecosystem services) are realised and communicated to stakeholders.
温和修复选项(GRO)是针对污染场地的风险管理策略或技术,不会导致土壤功能的大幅降低(或净收益)以及风险管理。明智地应用 GRO 可以提供:(a) 通过途径控制(通过隔离和稳定化)快速进行风险管理,同时对污染物源项进行更长期的去除或固定/隔离;以及 (b) 一系列额外的经济(例如生物质生成)、社会(例如休闲和娱乐)和环境(例如 CO2 封存)效益。为了优化或实现这些效益,需要进行有效的利益相关者参与。本文回顾了当前在实施 GRO 和其他修复选项时,利益相关者参与的部门实践及其重要性。由此确定了知识差距,并概述了在应用 GRO 期间促进更有效的利益相关者参与的策略。需要进一步研究将利益相关者参与策略整合到 GRO 的决策支持系统和工具中(以提高有效利益相关者参与和参与的效益,特别是针对行业专业人员),并制定用于确定不同利益相关者概况/类别的标准。示范场地可以通过提供在不同场地背景和条件下 GRO 有效性的证据,为利益相关者参与做出重大贡献。然而,需要采取有效的和持续的参与策略,以确保在更长的时间内有效地管理场地风险,并实现 GRO 的全部潜在效益(例如 CO2 封存、生物质生成的经济回报以及边际土地、舒适性和教育价值的“杠杆作用”、生态系统服务),并将其传达给利益相关者。