Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy;
Blood. 2013 Oct 24;122(17):2974-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-04-498139. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
Significant benefits for zoledronic acid (ZOL) over clodronate acid (CLO) were seen in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX randomized trial. ZOL significantly reduced skeletal-related events (SREs), and improved progression-free survival and overall survival (OS), making it the bisphosphonate of choice for newly diagnosed myeloma patients. In this analysis of Myeloma IX data, we have investigated the impact of response on bone disease in 1111 transplant-eligible patients. At posttransplant day 100, complete response (CR) was seen in 48% of patients, very good partial response (VGPR) in 20%, and partial response (PR) in 23%. For patients in VGPR or less, ZOL was superior to CLO in reducing SREs (P = .048), whereas for patients in CR, both agents were equivalent (P = .83). For OS, ZOL was associated with a significant benefit in patients in PR (P = .0091). No difference in OS was seen with patients in CR (P = .91) or VGPR (P = .74). These findings indicate that response category posttransplant may influence the impact of bisphosphonate therapy.
在医学研究委员会骨髓瘤 IX 随机试验中,唑来膦酸(zoledronic acid,ZOL)相对于氯膦酸(clodronate acid,CLO)具有显著优势。ZOL 显著减少了骨骼相关事件(skeletal-related events,SREs),改善了无进展生存期和总生存期(overall survival,OS),使其成为新诊断骨髓瘤患者的首选双膦酸盐。在对骨髓瘤 IX 数据的这项分析中,我们研究了反应对 1111 例适合移植患者骨病的影响。在移植后第 100 天,48%的患者达到完全缓解(complete response,CR),20%的患者达到非常好的部分缓解(very good partial response,VGPR),23%的患者达到部分缓解(partial response,PR)。对于 VGPR 或以下的患者,ZOL 在减少 SREs 方面优于 CLO(P =.048),而对于 CR 患者,两种药物等效(P =.83)。对于 OS,ZOL 在 PR 患者中具有显著获益(P =.0091)。在 CR 患者(P =.91)或 VGPR 患者(P =.74)中,OS 无差异。这些发现表明,移植后反应类别可能影响双膦酸盐治疗的影响。