Suppr超能文献

尸体头面部垂直提升的解剖学评估。

Anatomic evaluation of the vertical face-lift in cadavers.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013 Nov-Dec;15(6):422-7. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.1275.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

This study investigates how different orientations of tension vectors affect the amount of soft-tissue lift in specific cervicofacial regions.

OBJECTIVES

To compare differences in cosmetic neck and face changes generated by 3 different face-lift techniques, to quantify the amount of lift across different points on the face, and to quantify changes in platysmal dehiscence in each of 3 standard superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift techniques applied to fresh-frozen cadaver heads.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Ten cadaver heads in an academic tertiary care center.

INTERVENTION(S): Three different superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication rhytidectomy procedures were conducted in the following sequence: (1) vertical tension vector plication (vertical lift), (2) superolateral tension vector plication (superolateral lift), and (3) superolateral tension vector plication combined with midline platysmal plication (superolateral lift with platysmal plication).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

After completion of each technique, the amount of lift at 4 standard key points was measured and recorded, and differences in lift at the key points were analyzed.

RESULTS

Vertical lift was associated with greater total lift than superolateral lift alone or superolateral lift with platysmal plication (P < .001 for both). Platysmal dehiscence increased from baseline measurements after superolateral lift and decreased after vertical lift (P = .002 for both).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Our findings establish how different orientations of tension vectors applied during face-lift surgery achieve different structural changes to various key points across the face. This study helps the face-lift surgeon and student understand the underlying structural anatomic changes associated with different face-lift techniques, which ultimately result in different cosmetic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA.

摘要

重要性

本研究调查了张力矢量的不同方向如何影响特定颈面部区域的软组织提升量。

目的

比较 3 种不同面部提升技术产生的美容颈部和面部变化的差异,量化面部不同点的提升量,并量化 3 种标准浅表肌肉筋膜系统折叠面部提升技术中每个技术应用于新鲜冷冻尸体头部时颈阔肌分离的变化。

设计、地点和参与者:在学术三级保健中心的 10 个头骨。

干预措施

以下列顺序进行 3 种不同的浅表肌肉筋膜系统折叠除皱术:(1)垂直张力矢量折叠(垂直提升),(2)超外侧张力矢量折叠(超外侧提升),和(3)超外侧张力矢量折叠结合中线颈阔肌折叠(超外侧提升与颈阔肌折叠)。

主要结果和措施

完成每种技术后,测量并记录 4 个标准关键点的提升量,并分析关键点的提升差异。

结果

垂直提升与超外侧提升单独或超外侧提升与颈阔肌折叠相结合相比,总提升量更大(均 P <.001)。超外侧提升后颈阔肌分离度从基线测量值增加,垂直提升后减少(均 P =.002)。

结论和相关性

我们的发现确定了在面部提升手术中应用的张力矢量的不同方向如何在面部的不同关键点实现不同的结构变化。本研究帮助面部提升外科医生和学生了解与不同面部提升技术相关的潜在结构解剖变化,这最终导致不同的美容效果。

证据水平

无。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验