Suppr超能文献

Oncotype Dx 乳腺癌检测在临床实践中的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Ave, Box 357630, Seattle, WA 98195-7630, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Aug;141(1):13-22. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2666-z. Epub 2013 Aug 24.

Abstract

The impact of the Oncotype Dx (ODX) breast cancer assay on adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) treatment decisions has been evaluated in many previous studies. However, it can be difficult to interpret the collective findings, which were conducted in diverse settings with limited sample sizes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the results and provide insights about ODX utility. Studies, identified from PubMed, Embase, ASCO, and SABCS, were included if patients had ER+, node -, early-stage breast cancer, reported use of ODX to inform actual ACT decisions. Information was summarized and pooled according to: (1) distribution of ODX recurrence scores (RS), (2) impact of ODX on ACT recommendations, (3) impact of ODX on ACT use, and (4) proportion of patients following the treatment suggested by the ODX RS. A total of 23 studies met inclusion criteria. The distribution of RS categories was 48.8 % low, 39.0 % intermediate, and 12.2 % high (21 studies, 4,156 patients). ODX changed the clinical-pathological ACT recommendation in 33.4 % of patients (8 studies, 1,437 patients). In patients receiving ODX, receipt of ACT were: 28.2 % overall, 5.8 % low, 37.4 % intermediate, and 83.4 % high. Low RS patients were significantly more likely to follow the treatment suggested by ODX versus high RS patients RR: 1.07 (1.01–1.14) [corrected].The pooled results are consistent with most individual studies to date. The increased proportion of intermediate scores relative to original estimates may have implications for the clinical utility and cost impacts of testing. In addition, low versus high RS patients were significantly more likely to follow the ODX results, suggesting a tendency toward less aggressive treatment, despite a high ODX RS. Finally, there was a lack of studies on the impact of ODX on ACT use versus standard approaches, suggesting that additional studies are warranted.

摘要

Oncotype Dx(ODX)乳腺癌检测对辅助化疗(ACT)治疗决策的影响已在许多先前的研究中进行了评估。然而,由于这些研究是在不同的环境中进行的,样本量有限,因此很难解释这些综合研究结果。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以综合结果并提供有关 ODX 效用的见解。我们从 PubMed、Embase、ASCO 和 SABCS 中确定了符合以下条件的研究:(1)患者患有 ER+、淋巴结阴性、早期乳腺癌;(2)报告使用 ODX 来告知实际 ACT 决策;(3)研究中报告了 ODX 复发评分(RS)的分布;(4)ODX 对 ACT 建议的影响;(5)ODX 对 ACT 使用的影响;(6)遵循 ODX RS 建议的治疗的患者比例。共有 23 项研究符合纳入标准。RS 分类的分布为:低(48.8%)、中(39.0%)和高(12.2%)(21 项研究,4156 例患者)。ODX 改变了 33.4%患者的临床病理 ACT 推荐(8 项研究,1437 例患者)。在接受 ODX 的患者中,接受 ACT 的比例为:总体为 28.2%,低为 5.8%,中为 37.4%,高为 83.4%。低 RS 患者明显更倾向于遵循 ODX 建议的治疗,而高 RS 患者的 RR:1.07(1.01–1.14)[校正]。汇总结果与迄今为止的大多数单独研究一致。与原始估计相比,中间评分的比例增加可能对检测的临床效用和成本影响有影响。此外,低 RS 患者与高 RS 患者相比,明显更倾向于遵循 ODX 结果,这表明尽管 ODX RS 较高,但治疗倾向于不那么激进。最后,缺乏关于 ODX 对 ACT 使用与标准方法的影响的研究,这表明需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Aug;141(1):13-22. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2666-z. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell rescue for children with high-risk neuroblastoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 5;2015(10):CD006301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006301.pub4.
7
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell rescue for children with high-risk neuroblastoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 22(8):CD006301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006301.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of premenopausal breast cancer patients with a midrange 21-gene recurrence score.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Apr;108(4):219-230. doi: 10.4174/astr.2025.108.4.219. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
3
The EstroGene2.0 database for endocrine therapy response and resistance in breast cancer.
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024 Dec 19;10(1):106. doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00709-4.
4
Bladder Cancer Treatments in the Age of Personalized Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Potential Radiosensitivity Biomarkers.
Biomark Insights. 2024 Nov 6;19:11772719241297168. doi: 10.1177/11772719241297168. eCollection 2024.
6
Disparities in OncotypeDx Testing and Subsequent Chemotherapy Receipt by Geography and Socioeconomic Status.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 May 1;33(5):654-661. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1201.
7
Real-world use of multigene signatures in early breast cancer: differences to clinical trials.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 May;205(1):39-48. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07227-0. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
10
Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: An Old Story with a New End.
Genes (Basel). 2023 Jun 28;14(7):1364. doi: 10.3390/genes14071364.

本文引用的文献

1
Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: a clinical perspective.
Breast. 2013 Apr;22(2):109-120. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.016. Epub 2013 Feb 23.
2
Factors associated with receipt of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy in a diverse population-based sample.
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 1;30(25):3058-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.9564. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
7
US Insurance Program's Experience With a Multigene Assay for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.
J Oncol Pract. 2011 May;7(3 Suppl):e38s-45s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000303.
8
21-Gene recurrence scores: racial differences in testing, scores, treatment, and outcome.
Cancer. 2012 Feb 1;118(3):788-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26180. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验