• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国保险计划在早期乳腺癌多基因检测方面的经验。

US insurance program's experience with a multigene assay for early-stage breast cancer.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2011 May 1;17(5 Spec No):e194-202.

PMID:21711071
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

National guidelines recommend a 21-gene recurrence score (RS) to aid in adjuvant treatment decision in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, lymph node (LN)-negative early-stage breast cancer (ESBC). This study was performed to assess the economic implication of the assay in community practices from the perspective of a US payer.

METHODS

The study analyzed 952 women with ESBC enrolled with Humana (Louisville, KY) who were tested with the 21-gene RS between June 2006 and June 2010. The proportions of women classified by the assay according to RS risk category, use, costs of chemotherapy regimens and supportive care, and costs of adverse events were obtained from Humana. We adopted a validated Markov model to compute the cost implications of RS for a representative patient. The probability of risk of recurrence, the chemotherapy benefit, and the decision impact of RS were derived from published studies.

RESULTS

A total of 255 patients within the tested population received adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 10% of women at low risk, 36% of women at intermediate risk, and 72% of women at high risk of recurrence. On the basis of a meta-analysis in the reduction of chemotherapy after RS, the model estimated an average test saving of $1160 per patient. The immediate direct savings for chemotherapy drugs, supportive care, and management of adverse events were $1885, $2578, and $472, respectively. Prevention of recurrence through appropriate treatment of patients at high risk resulted in additional savings of $199.

CONCLUSION

The adoption of the 21-gene RS led to targeted management of women with ER-positive, LN-negative ESBC and consequently directed savings to the payer.

摘要

目的

国家指南建议使用 21 基因复发评分(RS)来辅助决策 ER 阳性、淋巴结阴性早期乳腺癌(ESBC)患者的辅助治疗。本研究旨在从美国支付者的角度评估该检测在社区实践中的经济意义。

方法

该研究分析了 2006 年 6 月至 2010 年 6 月期间在 Humana(肯塔基州路易斯维尔)接受 21 基因 RS 检测的 952 例 ESBC 女性患者。从 Humana 获得了根据 RS 风险类别、使用情况、化疗方案和支持性护理费用以及不良事件成本对女性进行分类的比例。我们采用了经过验证的 Markov 模型来计算 RS 对代表性患者的成本影响。复发风险概率、化疗获益和 RS 的决策影响来自已发表的研究。

结果

在测试人群中,共有 255 名患者接受了辅助化疗。低危组 10%的女性、中危组 36%的女性和高危组 72%的女性接受了辅助化疗。基于 RS 降低化疗概率的荟萃分析,该模型估计每位患者的平均检测节省 1160 美元。化疗药物、支持性护理和不良事件管理的直接节省分别为 1885 美元、2578 美元和 472 美元。通过对高危患者进行适当治疗,预防复发还可额外节省 199 美元。

结论

采用 21 基因 RS 可实现对 ER 阳性、淋巴结阴性 ESBC 女性的靶向管理,并为支付者带来相应的节省。

相似文献

1
US insurance program's experience with a multigene assay for early-stage breast cancer.美国保险计划在早期乳腺癌多基因检测方面的经验。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 May 1;17(5 Spec No):e194-202.
2
US Insurance Program's Experience With a Multigene Assay for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.美国保险计划在早期乳腺癌多基因检测方面的经验。
J Oncol Pract. 2011 May;7(3 Suppl):e38s-45s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000303.
3
Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer.在淋巴结阴性、雌激素受体阳性的早期乳腺癌中使用21基因逆转录聚合酶链反应检测法进行靶向化疗的经济学分析。
Am J Manag Care. 2005 May;11(5):313-24.
4
Cost-effectiveness of 21-gene assay in node-positive, early-stage breast cancer.21 基因检测在淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌中的成本效益。
Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(7):455-64.
5
Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting.采用 21 基因检测指导早期乳腺癌辅助化疗决策:德国环境下的成本效益评估。
J Med Econ. 2013;16(1):30-40. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.722572. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
6
Impact of a 21-gene RT-PCR assay on treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer: an economic analysis based on prognostic and predictive validation studies.21基因逆转录聚合酶链反应检测对早期乳腺癌治疗决策的影响:基于预后和预测验证研究的经济学分析
Cancer. 2007 Mar 15;109(6):1011-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22506.
7
Economic evaluation of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX) in lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on Japanese validation study (JBCRG-TR03).基于日本验证研究(JBCRG-TR03)的淋巴结阴性/阳性、激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌 21 基因标志物(Oncotype DX)的经济学评价。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun;127(3):739-49. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1243-y. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
8
Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.他莫昔芬辅助治疗5年后,来曲唑延长辅助治疗对绝经后早期乳腺癌女性的成本效益分析。
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Jul;12(7):374-86.
9
Association between standard clinical and pathologic characteristics and the 21-gene recurrence score in breast cancer patients: a population-based study.乳腺癌患者的标准临床和病理特征与21基因复发评分之间的关联:一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer. 2008 Feb 15;112(4):731-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23225.
10
Economic evaluation of the 70-gene prognosis-signature (MammaPrint®) in hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative early stage breast cancer in Japan.日本激素受体阳性、淋巴结阴性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性早期乳腺癌中 70 基因预后标志物(MammaPrint®)的经济学评价。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(2):759-68. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-1979-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.早期浸润性乳腺癌的基因表达谱检测:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(10):1-234. eCollection 2020.
2
Accounting for Capacity Constraints in Economic Evaluations of Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review.考虑精准医学经济评估中的产能约束:系统综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Aug;37(8):1011-1027. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00801-9.
3
21-Gene recurrence score decreases receipt of chemotherapy in ER+ early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of the NCDB 2010-2013.
21基因复发评分降低雌激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌患者接受化疗的比例:一项对2010 - 2013年国家癌症数据库的分析
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Sep;159(2):315-26. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3926-5. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
4
A retrospective study of the impact of 21-gene recurrence score assay on treatment choice in node positive micrometastatic breast cancer.回顾性研究 21 基因复发评分检测对淋巴结阳性微转移乳腺癌治疗选择的影响。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2015 Mar 17;8(1):107-22. doi: 10.3390/ph8010107.
5
The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotype Dx 乳腺癌检测在临床实践中的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Aug;141(1):13-22. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2666-z. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
6
Multigene assays and molecular markers in breast cancer: systematic review of health economic analyses.多基因检测与乳腺癌分子标志物:系统评价健康经济学分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun;139(3):621-37. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2559-1. Epub 2013 May 31.
7
Barriers to the use of personalized medicine in breast cancer.乳腺癌个体化医学应用的障碍。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Jul;8(4):e24-31. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000448. Epub 2012 May 22.
8
Cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in the context of multifactorial decision making to guide chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.21 基因复发评分检测在多因素决策指导早期乳腺癌化疗中的成本效益。
Genet Med. 2013 Mar;15(3):203-11. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.119. Epub 2012 Sep 13.