Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 19;8(8):e71546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071546. eCollection 2013.
Research on gay and other men who have sex with men's (G/MSM) preferences for sexual healthcare services focuses largely on HIV testing and to some extent on sexually transmitted infections (STI). This research illustrates the frequency and location of where G/MSM interface with the healthcare system, but it does not speak to why men seek care in those locations. As HIV and STI prevention strategies evolve, evidence about G/MSM's motivations and decision-making can inform future plans to optimize models of HIV/STI prevention and primary care.
We conducted a phenomenological study of gay men's sexual health seeking experiences, which included 32 in-depth interviews with gay and bisexual men. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and entered into Atlas.ti. We conducted a Framework Analysis.
We identified a continuum of sexual healthcare seeking practices and their associated drivers. Men differed in their preferences for separating sexual healthcare from other forms of healthcare ("fragmentation") versus combining all care into one location ("consolidation"). Fragmentation drivers included: fear of being monitored by insurance companies, a desire to seek non-judgmental providers with expertise in sexual health, a desire for rapid HIV testing, perceiving sexual health services as more convenient than primary care services, and a lack of healthcare coverage. Consolidation drivers included: a comfortable and trusting relationship with a provider, a desire for one provider to oversee overall health and those with access to public or private health insurance.
Men in this study were likely to separate sexual healthcare from primary care. Based on this finding, we recommend placing new combination HIV/STI prevention interventions within sexual health clinics. Furthermore, given the evolution of the financing and delivery of healthcare services and in HIV prevention, policymakers and clinicians should consider including more primary care services within sexual healthcare settings.
关于男同性恋者和其他男男性行为者(G/MSM)对性保健服务的偏好的研究主要集中在 HIV 检测上,在某种程度上也集中在性传播感染(STI)上。这项研究说明了 G/MSM 与医疗保健系统接触的频率和地点,但并没有说明为什么男性会选择在这些地点寻求护理。随着 HIV 和性传播感染预防策略的发展,关于 G/MSM 动机和决策的证据可以为未来优化 HIV/性传播感染预防和初级保健模型的计划提供信息。
我们对男同性恋者的性健康寻求经验进行了现象学研究,其中包括对 32 名男同性恋和双性恋男性进行了深入访谈。访谈内容逐字记录并输入到 Atlas.ti 中。我们进行了框架分析。
我们确定了性保健寻求实践及其相关驱动因素的连续体。男性在将性保健与其他形式的保健分开(“碎片化”)与将所有保健合并到一个地点(“整合”)方面存在偏好差异。碎片化的驱动因素包括:担心被保险公司监控、渴望寻求对性健康有专业知识且不评判的提供者、渴望快速进行 HIV 检测、认为性保健服务比初级保健服务更方便,以及缺乏医疗保健覆盖。整合的驱动因素包括:与提供者建立舒适和信任的关系、希望一个提供者来监督整体健康状况,以及有公共或私人医疗保险的人。
本研究中的男性可能会将性保健与初级保健分开。基于这一发现,我们建议将新的组合 HIV/性传播感染预防干预措施置于性健康诊所内。此外,鉴于医疗保健服务的融资和提供以及 HIV 预防的演变,政策制定者和临床医生应考虑在性保健环境中增加更多的初级保健服务。