Andrew J Klobuka, Alexey Markelov, Department of Surgery, Easton Hospital, Drexel University College of Medicine, Easton, PA 18042, United States.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Jun 27;5(6):167-72. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i6.167.
Mortality rates attributable to fulminant Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) colitis remain high and are reported to be 38%-80%. Historically, the threshold for surgical intervention has been judged empirically because level I evidence to guide decision making is lacking. Studies of the surgical management of C. difficile infection have been limited by small sample size and the lack of a standard definition of fulminancy. Multiple small and medium-sized series have examined the surgical management of C. difficile. However, because of a lack of prospective, randomized studies, it has been difficult to identify the optimal point for surgical intervention in patients with severe fulminant C. difficile colitis. Our goal was to analyze the existing body of literature in an attempt to define host constellations, which would predict the development of the more aggressive form of this disease and hence justify an early or earlier surgical intervention. A Pubmed search was conducted using the keywords "fulminant", "clostridium difficile", "surgery", and "colitis". Reviews and meta-analyses proposing indications for surgical consultation or operative management in patients with C. difficile colitis were included. After analyzing current literature, we identified a number of parameters that are associated with unfavorable outcomes. The parameters include age greater than 65 years old, peritoneal signs on physical examination, abdominal distension, signs of end-organ failure, hypotension less than 90 mmHg systolic blood pressure, tachycardia greater than 100 bpm, vasopressor requirement, elevated WBC count of greater than at least 16 × 10(9)/μL, serum lactate of greater than 2.2 mmol/L, and lastly, radiologic findings suggestive of pancolitis, ascites, megacolon, or colonic perforation. Even though fairly strong evidence exists in contemporary literature, we recommend use of these identified parameters with caution in clinical practice when it comes to the actual decision to treat certain patients more aggressively. The identified risk factors should be used to lower surgeons' threshold for operative treatment early in the course of the disease.
死亡率归因于暴发性艰难梭菌(C. difficile)结肠炎仍然很高,据报道为 38%-80%。历史上,手术干预的阈值是凭经验判断的,因为缺乏指导决策的一级证据。由于缺乏前瞻性、随机研究,因此很难确定严重暴发性艰难梭菌结肠炎患者进行手术干预的最佳时机。我们的目标是分析现有文献,试图确定宿主的特征,这些特征可以预测这种疾病更具侵袭性的形式的发展,并因此证明早期或更早的手术干预是合理的。使用关键词“暴发性”、“艰难梭菌”、“手术”和“结肠炎”在 Pubmed 上进行了搜索。纳入了提出手术咨询或手术治疗艰难梭菌结肠炎患者的适应证的综述和荟萃分析。在分析了当前的文献后,我们确定了一些与不良结局相关的参数。这些参数包括年龄大于 65 岁、体格检查时出现腹膜征象、腹胀、终末器官衰竭迹象、收缩压低于 90mmHg、心动过速大于 100 次/分钟、需要血管加压药、白细胞计数升高至少 16×10(9)/μL、血清乳酸大于 2.2mmol/L,最后,影像学检查提示全结肠炎、腹水、巨结肠或结肠穿孔。尽管当代文献中有相当有力的证据,但我们建议在临床实践中谨慎使用这些已确定的参数,以便在实际决策中更积极地治疗某些患者。应使用已确定的风险因素降低外科医生在疾病早期进行手术治疗的门槛。