我如何为患者选择移植物和配置移植物——原理和实践。
How I choose conduits and configure grafts for my patients-rationales and practices.
机构信息
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
出版信息
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul;2(4):527-32. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.07.17.
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) continues to be an effective therapy for many patients with lasting long-term durability and consistent outcomes, despite the development of percutaneous revascularization. The long-term outcome for surgical revascularization depends on multiple variables, including the choice of conduits. However, the choice of coronary conduits has been studied and debated for decades now. In this review article, we examined the current evidences and described our choice on coronary conduits and grafting strategies at our medical center.
摘要
冠状动脉旁路移植术（CABG）仍然是许多患者的有效治疗方法，具有持久的长期耐用性和一致的结果，尽管经皮血运重建技术得到了发展。手术血运重建的长期结果取决于多个变量，包括移植物的选择。然而，冠状动脉移植物的选择已经研究和争论了几十年。在这篇综述文章中，我们检查了目前的证据，并描述了我们在医疗中心对冠状动脉移植物和搭桥策略的选择。
相似文献
1
How I choose conduits and configure grafts for my patients-rationales and practices.我如何为患者选择移植物和配置移植物——原理和实践。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul;2(4):527-32. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.07.17.
2
Current trends in selection of conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术中血管移植物选择的当前趋势
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;65(10):549-556. doi: 10.1007/s11748-017-0807-8. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
3
Conduits' Biology Regulates the Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.血管移植物生物学特性调控冠状动脉旁路移植术的预后。
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 27;6(4):388-396. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.11.015. eCollection 2021 Apr.
4
Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术中桡动脉移植物与隐静脉移植物的比较：一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2011 Jan 12;305(2):167-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1976.
5
Conduits and Strategies for Arterial Revascularization in CABG.冠状动脉旁路移植术中动脉血运重建的管道与策略
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 30;24(7):188. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2407188. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Should saphenous vein grafts be the conduits of last resort for coronary artery bypass surgery?大隐静脉移植物应该成为冠状动脉搭桥手术的最后选择的血管 conduit 吗？ （注：这里“conduit”直译为“管道”，结合语境在医学领域可理解为“血管”等类似意思，表述稍显不那么准确，但按要求保留英文未完全意译）
Cardiol Rev. 2009 Sep-Oct;17(5):235-42. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181b84a27.
7
Saphenous vein grafts: to use or not to use?大隐静脉移植物：用还是不用？
Heart Lung Circ. 2004 Dec;13(4):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2004.04.004.
8
The fate of the radial artery conduit in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术中桡动脉血管桥的转归
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Aug;30(2):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.05.012. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
9
Saphenous vein grafts: to use or not to use?大隐静脉移植：用还是不用？
Heart Lung Circ. 2004 Jun;13(2):150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2004.03.013.
10
The radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting.用于冠状动脉搭桥术的桡动脉。
Acta Chir Iugosl. 2005;52(3):11-9. doi: 10.2298/aci0503011n.
引用本文的文献
1
Comparison of the internal thoracic artery flow dissected by video endoscopy or conventional technique.视频内镜下与传统方法解剖胸廓内动脉的血流比较。
Acta Cir Bras. 2021 Oct 8;36(8):e360803. doi: 10.1590/ACB360803. eCollection 2021.
2
Surgical myocardial revascularization outcomes in Kawasaki disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.川崎病的外科心肌血运重建结果：系统评价与荟萃分析
Open Med (Wars). 2021 Mar 9;16(1):375-386. doi: 10.1515/med-2021-0242. eCollection 2021.
3
The Sternal Management Accelerated Recovery Trial (S.M.A.R.T) - standard restrictive versus an intervention of modified sternal precautions following cardiac surgery via median sternotomy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.胸骨管理加速康复试验（S.M.A.R.T）——标准限制性措施与经正中胸骨切开术心脏手术后改良胸骨保护措施干预的对比：一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jun 23;18(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1974-8.
4
Left Internal Mammary Artery Versus Coronary Stents: Impact on Downstream Coronary Stenoses and Conduit Patency.左乳内动脉与冠状动脉支架：对下游冠状动脉狭窄和移植血管通畅性的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Sep 24;5(9):e003568. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003568.
5
A mechanical argument for the differential performance of coronary artery grafts.冠状动脉移植差异表现的力学观点。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Feb;54:93-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.09.017. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
6
Comparison of endothelial function of coronary artery bypass grafts in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: Which graft offers the best?糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者冠状动脉旁路移植血管内皮功能的比较：哪种移植物效果最佳？
Anatol J Cardiol. 2015 Aug;15(8):657-62. doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5613.
本文引用的文献
1
The no-touch saphenous vein as the preferred second conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting.首选非接触式隐静脉作为冠状动脉旁路移植术的第二移植物。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jul;96(1):105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.102. Epub 2013 May 16.
2
Revascularization strategies in patients with diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 11;368(15):1455-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1301244.
3
Is the second internal thoracic artery better than the radial artery in total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? A propensity score-matched follow-up study.在非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中，第二根胸廓内动脉是否优于桡动脉？一项倾向评分匹配的随访研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):632-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
4
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在三支病变合并左主干病变患者中的比较：随机、临床 SYNTAX 试验的 5 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):629-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60141-5.
5
Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial.糖尿病患者复杂冠状动脉疾病的治疗：SYNTAX 试验比较旁路手术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 5 年结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt017. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
6
Radial artery free and T graft patency as coronary artery bypass conduit over a 15-year period.桡动脉游离和 T 型移植物通畅作为冠状动脉旁路移植术在 15 年期间的桥血管。
Circulation. 2012 Sep 11;126(11 Suppl 1):S140-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.081497.
7
Impact of arterial revascularization in patients undergoing coronary bypass.
J Card Surg. 2012 Jul;27(4):427-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2012.01481.x. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
8
Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies.血运重建策略的比较效果。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 19;366(16):1467-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110717. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
9
Incidence, predictors and outcomes of incomplete revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting: a subgroup analysis of 3-year SYNTAX data.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术后不完全血运重建的发生率、预测因素和结局：SYNTAX 数据 3 年亚组分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Mar;41(3):535-41. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr105. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
10
The patency of sequential and individual vein coronary bypass grafts: a systematic review.序贯和单独静脉冠状动脉旁路移植术通畅率：系统评价。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Oct;92(4):1292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.038.
Zotero 插件