Watt Boolsen Merete, Plum Lise Munk, Hillingsø Jens G
Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet.
Ugeskr Laeger. 2013 Aug 26;175(35):1954-7.
We question the social science methodology in survey-questionnaire Danish National Survey of Patient Experiences (LUP). The results from the survey are part of the accreditation system in The Danish Health-care Quality Programme (DDKM). The methodological validity is researched through LUP-publications. We find that LUP has doubtful scientific quality which means that the validity of the survey results as such is questionable. Since this has consequences for the practical, economic, political and health-care decisions, we recommend that the total accreditation programme should be reconsidered.
我们对丹麦患者体验全国调查问卷（LUP）中的社会科学方法论提出质疑。该调查结果是丹麦医疗质量计划（DDKM）认证系统的一部分。通过LUP出版物对方法论的有效性进行了研究。我们发现LUP的科学质量存疑，这意味着调查结果本身的有效性也值得怀疑。鉴于此会对实际、经济、政治和医疗决策产生影响，我们建议重新考虑整个认证计划。
