1 Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University , Shanghai, China .
Thyroid. 2014 Feb;24(2):355-63. doi: 10.1089/thy.2013.0150. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
Ultrasonography is the most frequently used clinical tool for the identification, assessment, and follow-up of thyroid nodules. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the value of diagnostic ultrasonography indicators, to obtain rankings of the most valuable indicators in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules, and to analyze the optimal diagnostic points and clinical values.
One hundred forty-four patients with 172 thyroid nodules underwent preoperative ultrasonography examinations, including gray-scale ultrasonography (GSUS), color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS), and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). Fourteen indicators of thyroid nodules on GSUS, CDUS, and CEUS were selected to evaluate all thyroid nodules. The differences between the benign and malignant thyroid nodules in all indicators were analyzed by the chi-squared test; the diagnostic ultrasonography values were obtained by logistic regression; and the optimal diagnostic points were explored by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Of the 172 thyroid nodules that were surgically removed, 78 were benign and 94 were malignant. Ten indicators of GSUS and CEUS showed significant differences between the benign and malignant nodules (p<0.05), whereas four CDUS indicators had no value. The rankings of the valuable indicators were obtained according to their odds ratios (ORs). The top four indicators were ring enhancement and homogeneity of enhancement on CEUS, and microcalcification and halo on GSUS. These indicators were the most valuable, with ORs of greater than 20 in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The other six indicators-the relative arrival time of the nodule on CEUS, interior echogenicity on GSUS, peak interior echogenicity on CEUS, shape on GSUS, peak peripheral echogenicity on CEUS, and orientation on GSUS-were also valuable, with ORs less than 20. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for GSUS, CEUS, and the combination of GSUS and CEUS in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules were 0.936, 0.910, and 0.966, respectively. Five positive features of the 10 valuable indicators on GSUS and CEUS defined the cut-off for the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules, with a sensitivity of 89.4% (84/94), specificity of 93.6% (73/78), and accuracy of 91.3% (157/172).
The ring enhancement and homogeneity of enhancement of thyroid nodules on CEUS and the microcalcification and halo on GSUS were the four most valuable indicators in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Conjoint analysis of specific features of thyroid nodules on GSUS and CEUS could enhance the diagnostic value of thyroid nodules.
超声检查是甲状腺结节的识别、评估和随访最常用的临床工具。本研究旨在评估诊断超声指标的价值,获得鉴别诊断甲状腺结节最有价值指标的排序,并分析最佳诊断点和临床价值。
144 例 172 个甲状腺结节患者术前进行超声检查,包括灰阶超声(GSUS)、彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)和超声造影(CEUS)。选择 GSUS、CDUS 和 CEUS 上甲状腺结节的 14 个指标评估所有甲状腺结节,通过卡方检验分析所有指标在良恶性甲状腺结节之间的差异;采用 Logistic 回归获取诊断超声值;通过受试者工作特征曲线分析探讨最佳诊断点。
172 个甲状腺结节中,术后病理证实良性结节 78 个,恶性结节 94 个。GSUS 和 CEUS 的 10 个指标在良恶性结节之间有显著差异(p<0.05),CDUS 的 4 个指标无价值。根据比值比(OR)获得有价值指标的排序。CEUS 上的环状增强和增强均匀性以及 GSUS 上的微钙化和晕环是最有价值的指标,在鉴别诊断良性和恶性甲状腺结节的 OR 大于 20。其他 6 个指标——CEUS 上的结节相对达峰时间、GSUS 上的内部回声、CEUS 上的峰值内部回声、GSUS 上的形状、CEUS 上的峰值周边回声和 GSUS 上的方位——也有价值,OR 小于 20。GSUS、CEUS 和 GSUS 联合 CEUS 诊断甲状腺结节的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.936、0.910 和 0.966。GSUS 和 CEUS 上 10 个有价值指标的 5 个阳性特征定义了恶性甲状腺结节的诊断截断值,敏感性为 89.4%(84/94),特异性为 93.6%(73/78),准确性为 91.3%(157/172)。
CEUS 上甲状腺结节的环状增强和增强均匀性以及 GSUS 上的微钙化和晕环是鉴别诊断甲状腺结节的四个最有价值的指标。联合分析 GSUS 和 CEUS 上甲状腺结节的特定特征可以提高甲状腺结节的诊断价值。