Wu Qiong, Wang Yan, Li Yi, Hu Bing, He Zhi-Yan
Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated First People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Endocrine. 2016 Aug;53(2):480-8. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0850-0. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
We aimed to investigate different enhancement patterns of solid thyroid nodules on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and then to evaluate the corresponding diagnostic performance in the differentiation of benign and malignant nodules with and without enhancement. 229 solid thyroid nodules in 196 patients who had undergone both conventional ultrasound and CEUS examinations were classified into enhancement and non-enhancement groups. Besides, different enhancement patterns in the enhancement group were characterised with five indicators including arrival time, mode of entrance, echo intensity, homogeneity, and washout time. Then aforementioned indicators were compared between benign and malignant nodules of different sizes (<10 mm and >10 mm), and diagnostic performance of significant enhancement indicators was calculated. As for the enhancement group, there were statistically significant differences of <10 mm subgroup among three CEUS indicators including arrival time, mode of entrance, and washout time between malignant and benign thyroid nodules (p < 0.05), while all CEUS indicators showed statistically significant differences in the total group and ≥10 mm subgroup (p < 0.05). All the five CEUS indicators displayed better diagnostic performance with specificity (92.86, 92.14, 95.71, 90.71, and 90.71 %, respectively) and diagnostic accuracy (80.79, 79.48, 74.67, 75.11, and 81.66 %, respectively), while the sensitivity and negative predictive value of non-enhancement were 95.51 and 95.83 %, respectively, with an accuracy of 77.29 %. CEUS is a very promising diagnostic technique that could improve the diagnostic accuracy of identifying benign thyroid lesions to spare a large number of patients an unnecessary invasive procedure.
我们旨在研究实性甲状腺结节在超声造影(CEUS)下的不同增强模式,进而评估其在鉴别有无增强的良恶性结节方面的相应诊断性能。对196例同时接受传统超声和CEUS检查的患者的229个实性甲状腺结节进行分组,分为增强组和非增强组。此外,增强组中的不同增强模式通过包括到达时间、进入方式、回声强度、均匀性和消退时间在内的五个指标进行表征。然后比较不同大小(<10mm和>10mm)的良恶性结节之间的上述指标,并计算显著增强指标的诊断性能。对于增强组,在恶性和良性甲状腺结节之间,<10mm亚组的三个CEUS指标(到达时间、进入方式和消退时间)存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05),而所有CEUS指标在总体组和≥10mm亚组中均显示出统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。所有五个CEUS指标均显示出较好的诊断性能,特异性分别为92.86%、92.14%、95.71%、90.71%和90.71%,诊断准确性分别为80.79%、79.48%、74.67%、75.11%和81.66%,而非增强的敏感性和阴性预测值分别为95.51%和95.83%,准确性为77.29%。CEUS是一种非常有前景的诊断技术,可提高鉴别甲状腺良性病变的诊断准确性,从而使大量患者避免不必要的侵入性检查。