From the Academic Surgical Unit, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University London, Whitechapel, London, United Kingdom.
Ann Surg. 2014 May;259(5):939-43. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a6266c.
The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in fecal incontinence (FI).
There is extensive evidence regarding the efficacy of PTNS in urinary incontinence. Data on the efficacy of PTNS for FI are limited to a few small case series with relatively short-follow up.
A prospective cohort of patients with FI was studied. Incontinence scores were measured using a validated questionnaire (Cleveland Clinic Florida-FI score) at specific time points: before treatment, after completion of a treatment course (12 PTNS sessions), and before the last maintenance ("top-up") therapy. Deferment time and average number of weekly incontinence episodes were also estimated from a prospective bowel dairy kept by the patient at these time points. Quality of life was assessed with the Rockwood Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire.
A total of 150 patients were recruited to the study between January 2008 and June 2012. Analysis was performed on 115 patients who continued to receive PTNS after a median follow-up of 26 (range, 12-42) months. The baseline Cleveland Clinic Florida-FI score ±SD (12.0 ± 3.9) improved after 12 PTNS sessions (9.4 ± 4.6, P < 0.0001) and after "top-up" treatments (10.0 ± 4.3, P < 0.0001). The increase in the Cleveland Clinic Florida-FI score between the end of the 12th session and the last "top-up" therapy was also significant (P = 0.04). A similar pattern was seen for the deferment time and the quality of life scores. The median time between "top-up" sessions was 12 months (range, 1-40 months), significantly longer than the recommended interval of 6 months.
PTNS is a well-tolerated treatment with high acceptability in the majority of patients. It provides a sustained improvement in FI up to 42 months in a relatively noninvasive manner. The effect of PTNS diminishes with time and additional therapy sessions at 6 monthly intervals may result in greater improvements. PTNS ought to be considered as the first step in all patients with FI refractory to maximum conservative therapies.
本研究旨在评估经皮胫神经刺激(PTNS)治疗粪便失禁(FI)的长期疗效。
关于 PTNS 治疗尿失禁的疗效已有大量证据。关于 PTNS 治疗 FI 的疗效数据仅限于少数几个随访时间相对较短的小型病例系列。
对 FI 患者进行前瞻性队列研究。使用经过验证的问卷(克利夫兰诊所佛罗里达-FI 评分)在特定时间点测量失禁评分:治疗前、完成 12 次治疗疗程后(12 次 PTNS 治疗)以及最后一次维持治疗(“追加治疗”)前。还通过患者在这些时间点保存的前瞻性排便日记估算了延迟时间和每周失禁发作的平均次数。生活质量采用 Rockwood 粪便失禁生活质量问卷进行评估。
2008 年 1 月至 2012 年 6 月期间共招募了 150 名患者入组该研究。对中位随访 26 个月(范围 12-42 个月)后继续接受 PTNS 治疗的 115 名患者进行了分析。基线克利夫兰诊所佛罗里达-FI 评分±标准差(12.0±3.9)在 12 次 PTNS 治疗后改善(9.4±4.6,P<0.0001)和“追加治疗”后改善(10.0±4.3,P<0.0001)。第 12 次治疗结束与最后一次“追加治疗”之间克利夫兰诊所佛罗里达-FI 评分的增加也具有显著意义(P=0.04)。等待时间和生活质量评分也呈现出类似的模式。“追加治疗”之间的中位时间为 12 个月(范围 1-40 个月),显著长于推荐的 6 个月间隔。
PTNS 是一种耐受性良好的治疗方法,大多数患者的接受度高。它以相对无创的方式提供长达 42 个月的 FI 持续改善。随着时间的推移,PTNS 的效果会减弱,每 6 个月进行额外的治疗可能会带来更大的改善。对于所有对最大保守治疗有抵抗的 FI 患者,都应考虑将 PTNS 作为首选治疗方法。