Suppr超能文献

定制全膝关节置换术器械与标准器械的计算机断层扫描比较

Comparison of custom to standard TKA instrumentation with computed tomography.

作者信息

Ng Vincent Y, Arnott Lindsay, Li Jia, Hopkins Ronald, Lewis Jamie, Sutphen Sean, Nicholson Lisa, Reader Douglas, McShane Michael A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, The Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, 725 Prior Hall, 376 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA,

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1833-42. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2632-7. Epub 2013 Aug 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is conflicting evidence whether custom instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves component position compared to standard instrumentation. Studies have relied on long-limb radiographs limited to two-dimensional (2D) analysis and subjected to rotational inaccuracy. We used postoperative computed tomography (CT) to evaluate preoperative three-dimensional templating and CI to facilitate accurate and efficient implantation of TKA femoral and tibial components.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated a single-surgeon cohort of 78 TKA patients (51 custom, 27 standard) with postoperative CT scans using 3D reconstruction and contour-matching technology to preoperative imaging. Component alignment was measured in coronal, sagittal and axial planes.

RESULTS

Preoperative templating for custom instrumentation was 87 and 79 % accurate for femoral and tibial component size. All custom components were within 1 size except for the tibial component in one patient (2 sizes). Tourniquet time was 5 min longer for custom (30 min) than standard (25 min). In no case was custom instrumentation aborted in favour of standard instrumentation nor was original alignment of custom instrumentation required to be adjusted intraoperatively. There were more outliers greater than 2° from intended alignment with standard instrumentation than custom for both components in all three planes. Custom instrumentation was more accurate in component position for tibial coronal alignment (custom: 1.5° ± 1.2°; standard: 3° ± 1.9°; p = 0.0001) and both tibial (custom: 1.4° ± 1.1°; standard: 16.9° ± 6.8°; p < 0.0001) and femoral (custom: 1.2° ± 0.9°; standard: 3.1° ± 2.1°; p < 0.0001) rotational alignment, and was similar to standard instrumentation in other measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

When evaluated with CT, custom instrumentation performs similar or better to standard instrumentation in component alignment and accurately templates component size. Tourniquet time was mildly increased for custom compared to standard.

摘要

目的

对于全膝关节置换术(TKA)中定制器械与标准器械相比是否能改善假体位置,存在相互矛盾的证据。以往研究依赖于长肢X线片,仅限于二维(2D)分析,且存在旋转误差。我们使用术后计算机断层扫描(CT)来评估术前三维模板和定制器械(CI),以促进TKA股骨和胫骨假体的准确、高效植入。

方法

我们前瞻性评估了一组由单一外科医生进行手术的78例TKA患者(51例使用定制器械,27例使用标准器械),通过术后CT扫描,利用三维重建和轮廓匹配技术与术前影像进行对比。在冠状面、矢状面和轴面测量假体对线情况。

结果

定制器械术前模板对于股骨和胫骨假体尺寸的准确率分别为87%和79%。除1例患者的胫骨假体(相差2个尺寸)外,所有定制假体的尺寸偏差均在1个尺寸以内。使用定制器械的止血带时间(30分钟)比使用标准器械的(25分钟)长5分钟。在任何情况下,均未出现放弃定制器械而改用标准器械的情况,术中也无需调整定制器械的初始对线。在所有三个平面中,两种假体使用标准器械时偏离预期对线超过2°的异常值均多于使用定制器械的情况。定制器械在胫骨冠状面对线(定制器械:1.5°±1.2°;标准器械:3°±1.9°;p = 0.0001)以及胫骨(定制器械:1.4°±1.1°;标准器械:16.9°±6.8°;p < 0.0001)和股骨(定制器械:1.2°±0.9°;标准器械:3.1°±2.1°;p < 0.0001)旋转对线方面的假体位置更准确,在其他测量方面与标准器械相似。

结论

通过CT评估时,定制器械在假体对线方面的表现与标准器械相似或更佳,并且能准确地进行假体尺寸模板化。与标准器械相比,定制器械的止血带时间略有增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验