Kan Benjamin, Dundas Jane E, Nosaka Kazunori
School of Exercise and Health Sciences, Centre for Exercise and Sports Science Research, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Jul;38(7):734-9. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2012-0412. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC) strength and the time to failure (TTF) in an isometric (30% MVC) muscle endurance test of the elbow flexors were investigated. Fifteen men (mean age, 27.7 ± 8.4 years) were tested for MVC strength and TTF 2 times, separated by a 60-min rest. During the last 10 min of the rest period, 1 of 2 tDCS treatments or 1 sham intervention session was administered, in a randomized order, with 1 week between sessions. In the tDCS intervention, a 2 mA direct current was delivered for 10 min through an anode placed on the scalp, overlying the right motor cortical representation of the left arm; a cathode was secured over the right shoulder. In the sham intervention, the current was delivered for the first 30 s only. No significant differences between the first and second tDCS sessions were evident for MVC strength or TTF. For MVC strength (baseline, 66.0 ± 11.4 Nm), postintervention measures decreased by 5.9% ± 4.2% (p < 0.05), but no significant difference in the changes was evident between tDCS and sham sessions. TTF did not change significantly from preintervention (309.2 ± 91.6 s) to postintervention (327.2 ± 128.5 s), and there was no significant difference between interventions. It was concluded that the tDCS intervention did not affect muscle function, perhaps because of ceiling effects, in which the intervention does not enhance muscle function further when muscle function is already maximal.
研究了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对肘部屈肌等长(30%最大自主收缩[MVC])肌肉耐力测试中最大自主等长收缩(MVC)力量和疲劳时间(TTF)的影响。15名男性(平均年龄27.7±8.4岁)接受了MVC力量和TTF测试,共测试2次,中间间隔60分钟休息时间。在休息期的最后10分钟,以随机顺序进行两种tDCS治疗中的一种或一次假干预,两次治疗之间间隔1周。在tDCS干预中,通过置于头皮上、覆盖左臂右侧运动皮层代表区的阳极施加2毫安直流电,持续10分钟;阴极固定在右肩上方。在假干预中,电流仅在前30秒施加。MVC力量或TTF在第一次和第二次tDCS治疗之间没有明显差异。对于MVC力量(基线为66.0±11.4牛米),干预后测量值下降了5.9%±4.2%(p<0.05),但tDCS组和假治疗组之间的变化没有明显差异。TTF从干预前(309.2±91.6秒)到干预后(327.2±128.5秒)没有显著变化,且干预之间也没有显著差异。得出的结论是,tDCS干预不影响肌肉功能,可能是由于天花板效应,即当肌肉功能已经达到最大值时,该干预无法进一步增强肌肉功能。