Manousaridis Ioannis, Manousaridis Kleanthis, Peitsch Wiebke Katharina, Schneider Stefan Werner
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Ophthalmology, LKH Feldkirch, Academic Hospital of the University of Innsbruck, Feldkirch, Austria.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2013 Oct;11(10):981-91. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12141. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
Although lichen planus is one of the most common dermatological entities, very few reviews on its management exist in the literature. Standard therapeutic approaches include various topical treatments (including topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D analogs) and phototherapy modalities, as well as systemic corticosteroids and systemic retinoids. While localized skin lesions are easily managed with standard modalities, generalized forms and in particular involvement of hair follicles, nails and mucosa, as well as eyes are often challenging. This review proposes an evidence-based and differential therapeutic regime, taking into account many new emerging systemic therapies to help clinicians optimize treatment according to the type, extent and severity of the disease. An individual therapeutic ladder has been developed for each location, starting with standard modalities and ranking alternative systemic treatments (mainly methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine, as well as cyclosporine, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil) according to efficacy, evidence level and side-effect profile.
尽管扁平苔藓是最常见的皮肤病之一,但文献中关于其治疗的综述却很少。标准治疗方法包括各种局部治疗(包括局部用皮质类固醇、钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂、维生素D类似物)和光疗方式,以及全身性皮质类固醇和全身性维甲酸。虽然局部皮肤病变采用标准方式易于处理,但泛发型尤其是毛囊、指甲和黏膜以及眼部受累时,治疗往往具有挑战性。本综述提出了一种基于证据的差异化治疗方案,考虑到许多新出现的全身治疗方法,以帮助临床医生根据疾病的类型、范围和严重程度优化治疗。针对每个部位制定了个性化的治疗阶梯,从标准方式开始,并根据疗效、证据水平和副作用情况对替代全身治疗(主要是甲氨蝶呤和羟氯喹,以及环孢素、硫唑嘌呤和霉酚酸酯)进行排序。