Suppr超能文献

治疗皮肤扁平苔藓(第 2 部分):系统治疗综述。

Treatment of cutaneous lichen planus (part 2): a review of systemic therapies.

机构信息

a Faculty of Heath Sciences, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Durban University of Technology , Durban , South Africa.

b Department of Dermatology, University of KwaZulu-Natal and Nelson Mandela School of Medicine , Durban , South Africa.

出版信息

J Dermatolog Treat. 2019 Nov;30(7):633-647. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1544411. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

Abstract

Although numerous medications are available for the treatment of cutaneous lichen planus (CLP), recurrence is common and there is a lack of evidence of efficacy of many treatment options. Part 1 reviewed consolidated evidence from topical therapies and phototherapy. In Part 2, all systemic treatments are assessed. All English studies, regardless of design, investigating the outcome of systemic treatment for CLP, until January 2018, were included. While there were only a few well-designed randomized control trials (RCTs), evidence was extrapolated and graded from open trials, case series as well as case reports. Mini pulse therapy with corticosteroids should be considered over moderate daily dosing with retinoids being an alternative option. Low-dose methotrexate is considered effective and safe provided it is regularly monitored. Azathioprine, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil require larger more defined RCTs in resistant CLP. Low-molecular-weight heparins may be considered in patients with no response to first-line treatment. Biologics are potentially promising but there is a need for RCTs with a considerable duration to determine their long-term safety profiles. Evidence with various other drugs were reported. Clinicians may have a broader perspective on the efficacy of treatments across all study profiles.

摘要

尽管有许多药物可用于治疗皮肤扁平苔藓(CLP),但复发很常见,而且许多治疗选择的疗效证据不足。第 1 部分回顾了局部治疗和光疗的综合证据。第 2 部分评估了所有的系统治疗。纳入了截至 2018 年 1 月所有研究设计的、调查 CLP 系统治疗结果的英文研究,无论其设计如何。虽然仅有少数设计良好的随机对照试验(RCT),但仍从开放试验、病例系列以及病例报告中推断并分级了证据。与每天给予中等剂量的维 A 酸相比,应考虑采用皮质类固醇进行迷你脉冲治疗,后者是另一种选择。只要定期监测,低剂量甲氨蝶呤被认为是有效且安全的。环孢素和吗替麦考酚酯在抵抗性 CLP 中需要更大、更明确的 RCT。对于一线治疗无反应的患者,可以考虑使用低分子量肝素。生物制剂具有潜在的应用前景,但需要进行具有相当长随访时间的 RCT,以确定其长期安全性特征。报告了各种其他药物的证据。临床医生可能会对所有研究类型的治疗效果有更广泛的认识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验