Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Water Health. 2013 Sep;11(3):507-19. doi: 10.2166/wh.2013.213.
Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) programs in schools have been shown to improve health and reduce absence. In resource-poor settings, barriers such as inadequate budgets, lack of oversight, and competing priorities limit effective and sustained WASH service delivery in schools. We employed a cluster-randomized trial to examine if schools could improve WASH conditions within existing administrative structures. Seventy schools were divided into a control group and three intervention groups. All intervention schools received a budget for purchasing WASH-related items. One group received no further intervention. A second group received additional funding for hiring a WASH attendant and making repairs to WASH infrastructure, and a third group was given guides for student and community monitoring of conditions. Intervention schools made significant improvements in provision of soap and handwashing water, treated drinking water, and clean latrines compared with controls. Teachers reported benefits of monitoring, repairs, and a WASH attendant, but quantitative data of WASH conditions did not determine whether expanded interventions out-performed our budget-only intervention. Providing schools with budgets for WASH operational costs improved access to necessary supplies, but did not ensure consistent service delivery to students. Further work is needed to clarify how schools can provide WASH services daily.
学校的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)项目已被证明可以改善健康状况并减少缺勤。在资源匮乏的环境中,预算不足、缺乏监督以及竞争优先事项等障碍限制了学校中有效和持续的 WASH 服务提供。我们采用了一项整群随机试验来研究学校是否可以在现有行政结构内改善 WASH 条件。70 所学校被分为对照组和三个干预组。所有干预学校都获得了购买 WASH 相关物品的预算。一组没有得到进一步的干预。第二组获得了额外的资金用于雇用 WASH 服务员和修复 WASH 基础设施,第三组则提供了学生和社区监测条件的指南。与对照组相比,干预学校在提供肥皂和洗手水、处理饮用水和清洁厕所方面有了显著改善。教师报告了监测、维修和 WASH 服务员的好处,但 WASH 条件的定量数据并不能确定扩大干预措施是否优于我们仅提供预算的干预措施。为学校提供 WASH 运营成本预算有助于获得必要的用品,但不能确保向学生提供一致的服务。需要进一步努力阐明学校如何能够每天提供 WASH 服务。