Suppr超能文献

非家庭环境中饮用水、环境卫生和个人卫生监测:政策与实践重点

Monitoring drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in non-household settings: Priorities for policy and practice.

作者信息

Cronk Ryan, Slaymaker Tom, Bartram Jamie

机构信息

The Water Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.

WaterAid UK, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2015 Nov;218(8):694-703. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 11.

Abstract

Inadequate drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) in non-household settings, such as schools, health care facilities, and workplaces impacts the health, education, welfare, and productivity of populations, particularly in low and middle-income countries. There is limited knowledge on the status of WaSH in such settings. To address this gap, we reviewed international standards, international and national actors, and monitoring initiatives; developed the first typology of non-household settings; and assessed the viability of monitoring. Based on setting characteristics, non-household settings include six types: schools, health care facilities, workplaces, temporary use settings, mass gatherings, and dislocated populations. To-date national governments and international actors have focused monitoring of non-household settings on schools and health care facilities with comparatively little attention given to other settings such as workplaces and markets. Nationally representative facility surveys and national management information systems are the primary monitoring mechanisms. Data suggest that WaSH coverage is generally poor and often lower than in corresponding household settings. Definitions, indicators, and data sources are underdeveloped and not always comparable between countries. While not all countries monitor non-household settings, examples are available from countries on most continents suggesting that systematic monitoring is achievable. Monitoring WaSH in schools and health care facilities is most viable. Monitoring WaSH in other non-household settings would be viable with: technical support from local and national actors in addition to international organizations such as WHO and UNICEF; national prioritization through policy and financing; and including WaSH indicators into monitoring initiatives to improve cost-effectiveness. International consultations on targets and indicators for global monitoring of WaSH post-2015 identified non-household settings as a priority. National and international monitoring systems will be important to better understand status, trends, to identify priorities and target resources accordingly, and to improve accountability for progressive improvements in WaSH in non-household settings.

摘要

学校、医疗保健机构和工作场所等非家庭环境中饮用水、环境卫生和个人卫生条件不足(WaSH),会影响人群的健康、教育、福祉和生产力,在低收入和中等收入国家尤其如此。目前对于此类环境中WaSH状况的了解有限。为填补这一空白,我们审查了国际标准、国际和国家行为体以及监测举措;制定了非家庭环境的首个分类;并评估了监测的可行性。根据环境特征,非家庭环境包括六种类型:学校、医疗保健机构、工作场所、临时使用场所、大型集会和流离失所人群。迄今为止,各国政府和国际行为体对非家庭环境的监测主要集中在学校和医疗保健机构,而对工作场所和市场等其他环境的关注相对较少。具有全国代表性的设施调查和国家管理信息系统是主要的监测机制。数据表明,WaSH的覆盖范围总体较差,且往往低于相应的家庭环境。定义、指标和数据来源尚不完善,各国之间也并非总是具有可比性。虽然并非所有国家都对非家庭环境进行监测,但大多数大陆的国家都有相关实例,表明系统监测是可行的。对学校和医疗保健机构的WaSH进行监测最为可行。在以下条件下,对其他非家庭环境的WaSH进行监测也是可行的:除了世界卫生组织(WHO)和联合国儿童基金会(UNICEF)等国际组织外,还需得到地方和国家行为体的技术支持;通过政策和资金进行国家层面的优先排序;并将WaSH指标纳入监测举措以提高成本效益。2015年后全球WaSH监测目标和指标的国际磋商将非家庭环境确定为优先事项。国家和国际监测系统对于更好地了解状况、趋势,据此确定优先事项和目标资源,以及提高对非家庭环境中WaSH逐步改善的问责制至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验