1Divisions of Critical Care and Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY. 3Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. 4Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland. 6Wilhelminen Hospital, Vienna, Austria. 7Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic. 8Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ. 9University of Vermont, Burlington, VT. 10Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, NJ.
Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):281-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829f6242.
Guidelines recommend β-blockers and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers to improve long-term survival in hemodynamically stable myocardial infarction patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The prevalence and outcomes associated with β and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blocker therapy in patients with ongoing cardiogenic shock is unknown.
Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
In patients with cardiogenic shock lasting more than 24 hours enrolled in Tilarginine Acetate Injection in a Randomized International Study in Unstable Myocardial Infarction Patients With Cardiogenic Shock, we compared 30-day mortality in patients who received β or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or aldosterone antagonists) within 24 hours of randomization with those who did not.
None.
The final study population included 240 patients. A total of 66 patients (27.5%) had either β blocker or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blocker administered within the first 24 hours after the diagnosis of cardiogenic shock. β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, and aldosterone antagonists were prescribed in 18.8%, 10.6%, and 5.0% of patients, respectively.
The observed 30-day mortality among patients was higher in patients who received β or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers prior to cardiogenic shock resolution (27.3% vs 16.9%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.06-5.23; p = 0.035). Compared with patients not given β or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers, the 30-day mortality was higher among patients treated only with β-blockers (33.3% vs 16.9%, p = 0.017) but not among those only treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (18.2% vs 16.9%, p = 1.000).
The administration of β or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers is common in North America and Europe in patients with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock prior to cardiogenic shock resolution. This therapeutic practice was independently associated with higher 30-day mortality, although a statistically significant difference was only observed in the subgroup of patients administered β-blockers.
指南建议使用β受体阻滞剂和肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂来改善射血分数降低的血流动力学稳定型心肌梗死患者的长期生存率。在持续性心原性休克患者中,β受体阻滞剂和肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂治疗的流行情况和结局尚不清楚。
随机对照试验的二次分析。
在持续超过 24 小时的心原性休克患者中,接受替拉arginine 乙酸酯注射治疗不稳定型心肌梗死伴心原性休克的随机国际研究中,我们比较了在随机分组后 24 小时内接受β受体阻滞剂或肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂或醛固酮拮抗剂)治疗的患者与未接受治疗的患者的 30 天死亡率。
无。
最终的研究人群包括 240 例患者。共有 66 例患者(27.5%)在诊断为心原性休克后的头 24 小时内接受了β受体阻滞剂或肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂治疗。β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和醛固酮拮抗剂在 18.8%、10.6%和 5.0%的患者中分别被处方。
在心原性休克缓解前接受β受体阻滞剂或肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂治疗的患者,观察到的 30 天死亡率更高(27.3%比 16.9%;调整后的危险比,2.36;95%置信区间,1.06-5.23;p=0.035)。与未接受β受体阻滞剂或肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂治疗的患者相比,仅接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者的 30 天死亡率更高(33.3%比 16.9%,p=0.017),而仅接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗的患者则没有更高的死亡率(18.2%比 16.9%,p=1.000)。
在北美和欧洲,心肌梗死合并心原性休克的患者在心原性休克缓解前,常给予β受体阻滞剂或肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂治疗。这种治疗方法与较高的 30 天死亡率独立相关,尽管仅在接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的亚组中观察到统计学上的显著差异。