• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A prospective randomised trial to compare the efficacy of povidone-iodine 10% and chlorhexidine 2% for skin disinfection.一项比较10%聚维酮碘和2%氯己定用于皮肤消毒效果的前瞻性随机试验。
Indian J Anaesth. 2013 May;57(3):270-5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.115619.
2
Combined skin disinfection with chlorhexidine/propanol and aqueous povidone-iodine reduces bacterial colonisation of central venous catheters.洗必泰/丙醇与聚维酮碘水溶液联合进行皮肤消毒可减少中心静脉导管的细菌定植。
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jun;30(6):1081-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2282-9. Epub 2004 Apr 15.
3
Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol, with and without skin scrubbing, for prevention of intravascular-catheter-related infection (CLEAN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, two-by-two factorial trial.氯己定-酒精与聚维酮碘-酒精皮肤消毒,联合或不联合皮肤刷洗,用于预防血管内导管相关感染(CLEAN):一项开放标签、多中心、随机、对照、两因素析因试验。
Lancet. 2015 Nov 21;386(10008):2069-2077. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00244-5. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
4
Alcohol-based chlorhexidine vs. povidone iodine in reducing skin colonization prior to regional anesthesia procedures.在区域麻醉手术前,酒精洗必泰与聚维酮碘在减少皮肤定植方面的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Jul;94(7):807-12.
5
Comparison of four skin preparation strategies to prevent catheter-related infection in intensive care unit (CLEAN trial): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较四种皮肤准备策略以预防重症监护病房(CLEAN 试验)中导管相关感染的研究方案:一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2013 Apr 27;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-114.
6
Prospective, randomized trial of two antiseptic solutions for prevention of central venous or arterial catheter colonization and infection in intensive care unit patients.两种抗菌溶液预防重症监护病房患者中心静脉或动脉导管定植和感染的前瞻性随机试验。
Crit Care Med. 1996 Nov;24(11):1818-23. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199611000-00010.
7
Two per cent alcoholic chlorhexidine versus alcoholic five per cent povidone-iodine for the prevention of perineural catheter colonisation: The CHLOVEPI randomised, controlled trial.2%酒精洗必泰与 5%酒精聚维酮碘预防神经周围导管定植的比较:CHLOVEPI 随机对照试验。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Feb;40(1):100790. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.100790. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
8
Skin disinfection before epidural catheterization: comparative study of povidone-iodine versus chlorhexidine ethanol.硬膜外导管置入术前的皮肤消毒:聚维酮碘与氯己定乙醇的对比研究
Dermatology. 2002;204 Suppl 1:42-6. doi: 10.1159/000057724.
9
Antisepsis of the skin before spinal surgery with povidone iodine-alcohol followed by chlorhexidine gluconate-alcohol povidone iodine-alcohol applied twice for the prevention of contamination of the wound by bacteria: a randomised controlled trial.脊柱手术前先用聚维酮碘 - 酒精进行皮肤消毒,随后用葡萄糖酸洗必泰 - 酒精,聚维酮碘 - 酒精应用两次以预防伤口细菌污染:一项随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Oct;99-B(10):1354-1365. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2017-0291.R1.
10
A randomized open-label controlled trial of chlorhexidine-alcohol vs povidone-iodine for cesarean antisepsis: the CAPICA trial.氯己定-酒精与聚维酮碘用于剖宫产术皮肤消毒的随机开放标签对照试验:CAPICA试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):463.e1-463.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.060. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal antiseptic skin preparation agents for minimizing surgical site infection following surgery: cost and cost-effectiveness analysis.优化的手术部位感染预防用抗菌皮肤制剂:成本及成本效果分析。
BJS Open. 2024 Jan 3;8(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad160.
2
Faltering growth and sleepiness on peritoneal dialysis: Answers.腹膜透析时生长发育迟缓与嗜睡:答案
Pediatr Nephrol. 2023 Aug;38(8):2593-2597. doi: 10.1007/s00467-023-05882-5. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
3
Preoperative Intranasal Decolonization with Topical Povidone-Iodine Antiseptic and the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection: A Review.术前使用聚维酮碘局部防腐剂进行鼻腔去定植与手术部位感染发生率:一项综述
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Dec 11;26:e927052. doi: 10.12659/MSM.927052.
4
Preoperative Antisepsis with Chlorhexidine Versus Povidone-Iodine for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.术前氯己定与聚维酮碘消毒预防手术部位感染的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2020 May;44(5):1412-1424. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05384-7.
5
Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter-related infections.用于减少中心静脉导管相关感染的皮肤消毒
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 13;7(7):CD010140. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010140.pub2.
6
A Perspective on the Principles of Integrity in Infectious Disease Research.传染病研究中的诚信原则透视。
J Patient Saf. 2016 Jun;12(2):57-62. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000265.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of bactericidal properties of alcohol-based chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine prior to amniocentesis.在羊膜穿刺术之前,比较基于酒精的氯己定与聚维酮碘的杀菌性能。
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Jun;29(6):455-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304827. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
2
Alcoholic povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine-based antiseptic for the prevention of central venous catheter-related infections: in-use comparison.含酒精的聚维酮碘或洗必泰的抗菌剂用于预防中心静脉导管相关性感染:使用中的比较。
J Infect Public Health. 2012 Mar;5(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2011.10.007. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
3
No risk of surgical site infections from residual bacteria after disinfection with povidone-iodine-alcohol in 1014 cases: a prospective observational study.1014 例患者经聚维酮碘-酒精消毒后无残留细菌导致手术部位感染的风险:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):565-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182468b2d.
4
Infectious complications of regional anesthesia.区域麻醉的感染性并发症。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;24(5):573-80. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834a9252.
5
Coagulase-negative staphylococci: update on the molecular epidemiology and clinical presentation, with a focus on Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus.凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌:分子流行病学和临床特征的最新进展,重点关注表皮葡萄球菌和腐生葡萄球菌。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jan;31(1):7-20. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1270-6. Epub 2011 May 1.
6
Systematic review and cost analysis comparing use of chlorhexidine with use of iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis to prevent surgical site infection.系统评价和成本分析比较氯己定与碘用于术前皮肤消毒以预防手术部位感染的效果。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;31(12):1219-29. doi: 10.1086/657134. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative antisepsis with chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine in clean-contaminated surgery.系统评价和荟萃分析术前用洗必泰与聚维酮碘消毒在清洁污染手术中的效果。
Br J Surg. 2010 Nov;97(11):1614-20. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7214.
8
Minimizing wound contamination in a 'clean' surgery: comparison of chlorhexidine-ethanol and povidone-iodine.在“清洁”手术中尽量减少伤口污染:洗必泰乙醇与聚维酮碘的比较。
Chemotherapy. 2010;56(4):261-7. doi: 10.1159/000319901. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
9
Chlorhexidine-Alcohol versus Povidone-Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis.氯己定-酒精与聚维酮碘用于手术部位消毒。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 7;362(1):18-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810988.
10
Infectious complications of regional anesthesia.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Sep;22(3):451-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2008.06.003.

一项比较10%聚维酮碘和2%氯己定用于皮肤消毒效果的前瞻性随机试验。

A prospective randomised trial to compare the efficacy of povidone-iodine 10% and chlorhexidine 2% for skin disinfection.

作者信息

Kulkarni Atul P, Awode Rishikesh M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2013 May;57(3):270-5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.115619.

DOI:10.4103/0019-5049.115619
PMID:23983286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3748682/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Infectious complications of invasive procedures affect patient outcomes adversely. Choice of antiseptic solution at the time of insertion is one of the major factors affecting their incidence.

AIMS

This study was undertaken to compare efficacy of chlorhexidine 2% and povidone iodine 10% for skin disinfection prior to placement of epidural and central venous catheters (CVCs).

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

A prospective randomised trial in the operating rooms of a tertiary referral cancer centre.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive adult patients undergoing elective oncosurgery requiring placement of epidural and CVCs were enrolled. Paired skin swabs were collected before and after application of the antiseptic solution. The samples were incubated in McConkey's media and blood agar at 35°C for up to 24 h. Any bacterial growth was graded as: <10 colonies - poor growth, 10-50 colonies - moderate growth and >50 colonies as heavy growth. Data on demographics and antibiotic prophylaxis and costs was collected for all patients.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney tests were used to analyse data, P<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Demographics and antibiotic prophylaxis use was similar in both groups. Before application of antiseptic solution, a variety of micro-organisms were grown from most patients with growth ranging from none-heavy. No organism was grown after application of either antiseptic solution from any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no differences between 2% chlorhexidine and 10% povidone-iodine for skin disinfection in regard to costs, efficacy or side-effects.

摘要

背景

侵入性操作的感染并发症会对患者预后产生不利影响。插入操作时抗菌溶液的选择是影响其发生率的主要因素之一。

目的

本研究旨在比较2%氯己定和10%聚维酮碘在硬膜外导管和中心静脉导管(CVC)置入术前用于皮肤消毒的效果。

设置与设计

在一家三级转诊癌症中心的手术室进行的一项前瞻性随机试验。

方法

连续纳入60例接受择期肿瘤手术且需要置入硬膜外导管和CVC的成年患者。在应用抗菌溶液前后采集配对的皮肤拭子。样本在麦康凯培养基和血琼脂中于35°C孵育长达24小时。任何细菌生长分级为:<10个菌落 - 生长不良,10 - 50个菌落 - 中度生长,>50个菌落为重度生长。收集所有患者的人口统计学数据、抗生素预防使用情况及费用。

统计分析

采用学生t检验和曼 - 惠特尼检验分析数据,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

两组的人口统计学数据和抗生素预防使用情况相似。在应用抗菌溶液前,大多数患者培养出多种微生物,生长范围从无到重度。应用任何一种抗菌溶液后,任何患者均未培养出微生物。

结论

我们发现2%氯己定和10%聚维酮碘在皮肤消毒的成本、效果或副作用方面没有差异。