Suppr超能文献

洗必泰/丙醇与聚维酮碘水溶液联合进行皮肤消毒可减少中心静脉导管的细菌定植。

Combined skin disinfection with chlorhexidine/propanol and aqueous povidone-iodine reduces bacterial colonisation of central venous catheters.

作者信息

Langgartner Julia, Linde Hans-Jörg, Lehn Norbert, Reng Michael, Schölmerich Jürgen, Glück Thomas

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, 93042 Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jun;30(6):1081-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2282-9. Epub 2004 Apr 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Central venous catheter (CVC)-related infections may be caused by micro-organisms introduced from the skin surface into deeper tissue at the time of CVC insertion. The optimal disinfection regimen to avoid catheter-related infections has not yet been defined. This study compares three different approaches.

DESIGN

Prospective randomised trial.

SETTING

A tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

One hundred nineteen patients scheduled electively to receive 140 CVCs.

INTERVENTIONS

Skin disinfection was performed with either povidone-iodine 10% (PVP-iodine), chlorhexidine 0.5%/propanol 70%, or chlorhexidine 0.5%/propanol 70% followed by PVP-iodine 10%. Prior to disinfection, a swab from the site of insertion was taken for culture. CVCs were removed if no longer needed or infection was suspected. All catheters were cultured quantitatively after removal.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

Bacteria could be isolated from 20.7% of the catheter tips. Bacterial growth was found in 30.8% of the catheters placed after skin disinfection with povidone-iodine, in 24.4% after disinfection with propanol/chlorhexidine and in 4.7% after disinfection with propanol/chlorhexidine followed by povidone-iodine ( p=0.006). In 15 cases, the same organism was isolated from the skin swab and the catheter tip. Ten of these paired isolates showed the same pattern in a pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin disinfection with propanol/chlorhexidine followed by PVP-iodine was superior in the prevention of microbial CVC colonisation compared to either of the regimens alone. These results support the concept that catheter infections can originate from bacterial translocation at the time of catheter insertion.

摘要

目的

中心静脉导管(CVC)相关感染可能是在CVC插入时由皮肤表面引入更深层组织的微生物所引起。尚未确定避免导管相关感染的最佳消毒方案。本研究比较了三种不同方法。

设计

前瞻性随机试验。

地点

一家三级护理医院。

患者和参与者

119例计划择期接受140根CVC的患者。

干预措施

使用10%聚维酮碘(PVP-碘)、0.5%氯己定/70%丙醇或0.5%氯己定/70%丙醇后再用PVP-碘进行皮肤消毒。消毒前,从插入部位取拭子进行培养。如果不再需要或怀疑感染,则拔除CVC。所有导管拔除后进行定量培养。

测量与结果

20.7%的导管尖端可分离出细菌。在用聚维酮碘进行皮肤消毒后置入的导管中,30.8%发现有细菌生长;用丙醇/氯己定消毒后为24.4%;用丙醇/氯己定后再用聚维酮碘消毒后为4.7%(p=0.006)。15例中,从皮肤拭子和导管尖端分离出相同的微生物。其中10对分离株在脉冲场凝胶电泳分析中显示出相同的图谱。

结论

与单独使用任何一种方案相比,先用丙醇/氯己定再用PVP-碘进行皮肤消毒在预防微生物CVC定植方面更具优势。这些结果支持导管感染可源于导管插入时细菌移位这一概念。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验