Yang Hui-zhong, Wang Wen-kui, Yuan Li-li, Wang Shun-bin, Luo Gao-xing, Wu Jun, Niu Xi-hua, Sun Bing-wei, DU Guang-gang, Li Hai-hui, Chen Shun, Chen Zhao-hong, Xia Cheng-de, Li Shu-ren, Lü Tao, Sun Hui, Chen Xi, He Xiao-long, Zhang Bing, Huan Jing-ning
Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2013 Apr;29(2):177-80.
To evaluate the effect of FLAMIGEL (hydrogel dressing) on the repair of residual burn wound.
Sixty burn patients with residual wounds hospitalized in 6 burn units from November 2011 to May 2012 were enrolled in the multi-center, randomized, and self-control clinical trial. Two residual wounds of each patient were divided into groups T (treated with FLAMIGEL) and C (treated with iodophor gauze) according to the random number table. On post treatment day (PTD) 7 and 14, wound healing rate was calculated, with the number of completely healed wound counted. The degree of pain patient felt during dressing change was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The mean numbers of wounds with score equal to zero, more than zero and less than or equal to 3, more than 3 and less than or equal to 6, more than 6 and less than or equal to 10 were recorded respectively. Wound secretion or exudate samples were collected for bacterial culture, and the side effect was observed. Data were processed with repeated measure analysis of variance, t test, chi-square test, and nonparametric rank sum test.
Wound healing rate of groups T, C on PTD 7 was respectively (67 ± 24)%, (45 ± 25)%, and it was respectively (92 ± 16)%, (72 ± 23)% on PTD 14. There was statistically significant difference in wound healing rate on PTD 7, 14 between group T and group C (F = 32.388, P < 0.01). Ten wounds in group T and four wounds in group C were healed completely on PTD 7, with no significant difference between them (χ(2) = 0, P > 0.05). Forty-two wounds in group T and seven wounds in group C healed completely on PTD 14, with statistically significant difference between them (χ(2) = 42.254, P < 0.01). Patients in group T felt mild pain during dressing change for 37 wounds, with VAS score higher than zero and lower than or equal to 3. Evident pain was observed in patients of group C during dressing change for 43 wounds, and it scored higher than 3 and less than or equal to 6 by VAS evaluation. There was statistically significant difference in mean number of wounds with different grade of VAS score between group T and group C (Z = -4.638, P < 0.01). Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, E. coli, Baumanii, and Staphylococcus epidermidis were all detected in both groups, but there was no statistical difference between group T and group C (χ(2) = 0.051, P > 0.05). No side effect was observed in either of the two groups during the whole trial.
FLAMIGEL can accelerate the healing of residual burn wounds and obviously relieve painful sensation during dressing change.
评估FLAMIGEL(水凝胶敷料)对残余烧伤创面修复的效果。
选取2011年11月至2012年5月在6个烧伤治疗单元住院的60例有残余创面的烧伤患者,进行多中心、随机、自身对照临床试验。将每位患者的两个残余创面根据随机数字表分为T组(用FLAMIGEL治疗)和C组(用碘伏纱布治疗)。在治疗后第7天(PTD 7)和第14天(PTD 14),计算创面愈合率,统计完全愈合的创面数量。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估患者换药时的疼痛程度,分别记录VAS评分为零、大于零且小于或等于3、大于3且小于或等于6、大于6且小于或等于10的创面平均数量。采集创面分泌物或渗出物样本进行细菌培养,并观察副作用。数据采用重复测量方差分析、t检验、卡方检验和非参数秩和检验进行处理。
T组、C组在PTD 7时的创面愈合率分别为(67±24)%、(45±25)%,在PTD 14时分别为(92±16)%、(72±23)%。T组和C组在PTD 7、14时的创面愈合率差异有统计学意义(F = 32.388,P < 0.01)。PTD 7时,T组有10个创面、C组有4个创面完全愈合,两组间差异无统计学意义(χ(2)=0,P > 0.05)。PTD 14时,T组有42个创面、C组有7个创面完全愈合,两组间差异有统计学意义(χ(2)=42.254,P < 0.01)。T组37个创面换药时患者感觉轻度疼痛,VAS评分大于零且小于或等于3。C组43个创面换药时患者有明显疼痛,VAS评估评分大于3且小于或等于6。T组和C组不同VAS评分等级的创面平均数量差异有统计学意义(Z = -4.638,P < 0.01)。两组均检测到金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、大肠埃希菌、鲍曼不动杆菌和表皮葡萄球菌,但T组和C组间差异无统计学意义(χ(2)=0.051,P > 0.05)。整个试验期间两组均未观察到副作用。
FLAMIGEL可加速残余烧伤创面的愈合,并明显减轻换药时的疼痛感觉。