Suppr超能文献

保乳手术中的术前定位与手术切缘

Preoperative localization and surgical margins in conservative breast surgery.

作者信息

Corsi F, Sorrentino L, Bossi D, Sartani A, Foschi D

机构信息

Surgery Division, Department of Clinical Sciences, L. Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Surg Oncol. 2013;2013:793819. doi: 10.1155/2013/793819. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

Abstract

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the treatment of choice for early breast cancer. The adequacy of surgical margins (SM) is a crucial issue for adjusting the volume of excision and for avoiding local recurrences, although the precise definition of an adequate margins width remains controversial. Moreover, other factors such as the biological behaviour of the tumor and subsequent proper systemic therapies may influence the local recurrence rate (LRR). However, a successful BCS requires preoperative localization techniques or margin assessment techniques. Carbon marking, wire-guided, biopsy clips, radio-guided, ultrasound-guided, frozen section analysis, imprint cytology, and cavity shave margins are commonly used, but from the literature review, no single technique proved to be better among the various ones. Thus, an association of two or more methods could result in a decrease in rates of involved margins. Each institute should adopt its most congenial techniques, based on the senologic equipe experience, skills, and technologies.

摘要

保乳手术(BCS)是早期乳腺癌的首选治疗方法。手术切缘(SM)的充分性是调整切除范围和避免局部复发的关键问题,尽管切缘宽度足够的精确定义仍存在争议。此外,其他因素,如肿瘤的生物学行为和后续适当的全身治疗,可能会影响局部复发率(LRR)。然而,成功的保乳手术需要术前定位技术或切缘评估技术。常用的方法有碳标记、钢丝引导、活检夹、放射性引导、超声引导、冰冻切片分析、印片细胞学检查和腔面剃须切缘,但从文献综述来看,在各种方法中没有一种方法被证明更好。因此,两种或更多方法的联合应用可能会降低切缘受累率。每个机构应根据乳腺科团队的经验、技能和技术,采用最适合自己的技术。

相似文献

1
Preoperative localization and surgical margins in conservative breast surgery.
Int J Surg Oncol. 2013;2013:793819. doi: 10.1155/2013/793819. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
2
Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Breast. 2013 Oct;22(5):698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.019. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
4
MarginProbe®--final results of the German post-market study in breast conserving surgery of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Breast. 2014 Feb;23(1):94-6. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
6
Circumferential Shaving of the Cavity in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(13):4256-4263. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07725-w. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
The surgical margin status after breast-conserving surgery: discussion of an open issue.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jan;113(2):397-402. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9929-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Imaging in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;16(16):2851. doi: 10.3390/cancers16162851.
2
An exploratory clinical trial of preoperative non-invasive localization before breast-conserving surgery using augmented reality technology.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jul;206(1):31-44. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07272-3. Epub 2024 May 14.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Radar Localisation Versus Wire Localisation for Wide Local Excision of Non-palpable Breast Cancer.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3916-3925. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15142-x. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
6
7
Magnetic marker localisation in breast cancer surgery.
Arch Med Sci. 2020 Mar 14;19(1):122-127. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.93673. eCollection 2023.
9
Characterization and Evaluation of Injectable Biodegradable Polymer Multimodality Radiologic Markers in an In Vivo Murine Model.
Biomacromolecules. 2022 Apr 11;23(4):1672-1679. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01570. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

3
A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique.
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Feb;72(2):145-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182605598.
5
Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for palpable breast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jan;14(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70527-2. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
6
Surgical margins in lumpectomy for breast cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 27;367(13):1269-70; author reply 1270. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1209255.
7
Bigger margins are not better in breast conserving surgery.
BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5855. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5855.
8
Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3236-45. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2492-2. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
10
Surgical margins in lumpectomy for breast cancer--bigger is not better.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 5;367(1):79-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1202521.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验