Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
To assess the influence of symptom intensity, mood, and comorbidities on patient-clinician agreement and the consistency of responses to functional patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Two data sources were used. The first, a cross-sectional database of patients with breast cancer who completed functional PROs and were administered the FIM, was used to examine whether average pain intensity (as measured with an 11-point numeric rating scale [NRS]) and Rand Mental Health inventory scores differed among those rating their functional independence as different than clinicians. The second, a longitudinal database of 311 adults with late-stage lung cancer who completed the Activity Measure for Post Acute Care Computer Adaptive Test (AM PAC CAT) with differences between their expected and actual responses as reflected in their AM PAC CAT SEs.
Two tertiary medical centers.
Data source #1, 163 women with stage IV breast cancer; data source #2, 311 adults with late-stage lung cancer.
Not applicable.
Data source #1, FIM, pain NRS, Older Americans Resource Study activities of daily living subscale, Physical Function-10, Mental Health Inventory-17. Data source #2, AM PAC CAT and NRS symptom ratings.
Pain intensity was significantly higher when clinicians and patients disagreed regarding a patient's independence in the ability to transfer (NRS pain severity, 3.78 vs 2.40; P=.014), groom (3.71 vs 2.36, P=.009), bathe (3.76 vs 2.40, P=.016), and dress (3.09 vs 2.44, P=.034). The magnitude of AM PAC CAT SEs was significantly associated with the severity of participants' pain, dyspnea, and fatigue, as well as the presence of musculoskeletal disorders and coronary artery disease. Neither mood nor emotional distress was associated with clinician-patient agreement or AM PAC CAT SE.
Pain intensity is associated with disagreement between patients and clinicians about the patient's level of functioning. Moreover, physical symptoms (pain, dyspnea, fatigue) as well as specific medical comorbidities (musculoskeletal disorders, coronary artery disease), but not mood, are associated with inconsistency in patients' assessment of their functional abilities.
评估症状严重程度、情绪和合并症对患者-临床医生一致性以及对功能性患者报告结局(PRO)反应一致性的影响。
使用了两个数据源。第一个是接受功能性 PRO 并接受 FIM 评估的乳腺癌患者的横断面数据库,用于检查平均疼痛强度(用 11 点数字评分量表 [NRS] 测量)和 Rand 心理健康量表评分是否在功能独立性评估与临床医生不同的患者中存在差异。第二个是接受过活动评估后康复治疗计算机自适应测试(AM-PAC CAT)的 311 例晚期肺癌成人的纵向数据库,反映在他们的 AMPAC CAT SE 中的他们的预期和实际反应之间的差异。
两个三级医疗中心。
数据源 #1,163 例 IV 期乳腺癌女性;数据源 #2,311 例晚期肺癌成人。
不适用。
数据源 #1,FIM、疼痛 NRS、美国老年人资源研究日常生活活动量表、身体功能-10、心理健康量表-17。数据源 #2,AM-PAC CAT 和 NRS 症状评分。
当临床医生和患者对患者在转移(NRS 疼痛严重程度,3.78 与 2.40;P=.014)、修饰(3.71 与 2.36,P=.009)、洗澡(3.76 与 2.40,P=.016)和穿衣(3.09 与 2.44,P=.034)能力方面的独立性存在分歧时,疼痛强度显著更高。AM-PAC CAT SE 的大小与参与者的疼痛、呼吸困难和疲劳严重程度以及肌肉骨骼疾病和冠状动脉疾病的存在显著相关。情绪或情绪困扰与临床医生-患者一致性或 AMPAC CAT SE 均无关联。
疼痛强度与患者和临床医生对患者功能水平的意见分歧有关。此外,身体症状(疼痛、呼吸困难、疲劳)以及特定的合并症(肌肉骨骼疾病、冠状动脉疾病),但不是情绪,与患者对自身功能能力的评估不一致相关。