Suppr超能文献

在急性脑卒中单元环境中,用于诊断谵妄或认知障碍的简短筛查测试的准确性。

Test accuracy of short screening tests for diagnosis of delirium or cognitive impairment in an acute stroke unit setting.

机构信息

From the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences (R.L., T.J.Q.) and Undergraduate Medical School (S.C., C.J., E.M., G.S.), College of Medial, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):3078-83. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001724. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Guidelines recommend cognitive screening in acute stroke. Various instruments are available, with no consensus on a preferred tool. We aimed to describe test accuracy of brief screening tools for diagnosis of cognitive impairment and delirium in acute stroke.

METHODS

We collected data on sequential stroke unit admission in a single center. Four assessors trained in cognitive testing independently performed screening and reference tests. Brief assessments comprised the following: 10- and 4-point Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT-10; AMT-4); 4-A Test (4AT); Clock Drawing Test (CDT); Cog-4; and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). We also recorded the multidisciplinary team's informal review using single question (SQ). We compared against reference standards of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Confusion Assessment Method for delirium using usual diagnostic cutpoints. For MoCA, we described effects of lowering the diagnostic threshold to MoCA <24 and MoCA <20. We described sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values.

RESULTS

Over a 10-week period, 111 subjects had cognitive assessment data. Subjects were 50% male (n=55), and median age was 74 years (interquartile range, 64-85). AMT-4, AMT-10, and SQ all had excellent (1.00) specificity for detection of cognitive impairment, although sensitivity was poor (all <0.60). The 4AT had greatest sensitivity for detecting delirium (1.00 [confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.00]) and reasonable specificity (0.82 [CI, 0.72-0.89]). Properties of 4AT for detection of cognitive impairment, at the traditional MoCA threshold, were also good (sensitivity, 0.86; specificity, 0.78). Using diagnostic thresholds of MoCA ≤26, <24, and <20 gave proportions with cognitive impairments of 86%, 61%, and 49%, respectively, with resulting changes in screening test properties. At lower MoCA thresholds, CDT had favorable sensitivity and specificity (MoCA <20: sensitivity, 0.93, specificity, 0.66; MoCA <24: sensitivity, 0.85, specificity, 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Many brief screening assessments are specific but not sensitive for detection of cognitive impairment in acute stroke. Our primary analysis suggests that 4AT is a reasonable choice for delirium and cognitive screening in this setting. However, these data are based on standard MoCA diagnostic threshold and may not be suited for an acute stroke population.

摘要

背景与目的

指南建议对急性脑卒中患者进行认知筛查。目前有多种工具可供选择,但尚未达成对首选工具的共识。本研究旨在描述用于诊断急性脑卒中患者认知障碍和谵妄的简短筛查工具的测试准确性。

方法

我们在一个单中心连续收集了脑卒中单元入院患者的数据。四位经过认知测试培训的评估员独立进行了筛查和参考测试。简短评估包括以下内容:10 分和 4 分简易精神状态检查(AMT-10;AMT-4);4 项测试(4AT);画钟测验(CDT);Cog-4;和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)。我们还记录了多学科团队使用单个问题(SQ)的非正式评估。我们将其与蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和谵妄评估方法的参考标准进行了比较,使用了通常的诊断切点。对于 MoCA,我们描述了将诊断阈值降低至 MoCA<24 和 MoCA<20 的效果。我们描述了敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。

结果

在 10 周的时间内,有 111 名患者接受了认知评估。患者中 50%为男性(n=55),中位年龄为 74 岁(四分位间距,64-85)。AMT-4、AMT-10 和 SQ 对检测认知障碍的特异性均为 1.00(极好),但敏感性均较差(均<0.60)。4AT 对检测谵妄的敏感性最高(1.00[置信区间[CI],0.74-1.00]),特异性也较好(0.82[CI,0.72-0.89])。4AT 对检测认知障碍的特性,在传统的 MoCA 阈值下,也较好(敏感性,0.86;特异性,0.78)。使用 MoCA≤26、<24 和<20 的诊断阈值,分别有 86%、61%和 49%的患者存在认知障碍,从而改变了筛查测试的特性。在较低的 MoCA 阈值下,CDT 的敏感性和特异性较好(MoCA<20:敏感性,0.93,特异性,0.66;MoCA<24:敏感性,0.85,特异性,0.77)。

结论

许多简短的筛查评估对急性脑卒中患者的认知障碍检测具有特异性,但不敏感。我们的主要分析表明,4AT 是该环境下用于谵妄和认知筛查的合理选择。然而,这些数据是基于标准的 MoCA 诊断阈值,可能不适合急性脑卒中人群。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验