Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192, Japan.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013 Oct;42(4):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
The clinical implications of free linezolid monitoring have not been fully clarified in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variability in pharmacokinetics of free linezolid and its relationship with susceptibility to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in critically ill patients. Twenty critically ill MRSA-infected patients receiving intravenous linezolid were enrolled. Blood specimens were collected by 12-h sampling after dosing at Day 7. The medians (interquartile range) of the minimum free concentration, area under the concentration-time curve of total and free linezolid from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24) and fAUC(0-24), respectively) and percentage bound were 9.9 μg/mL (5.2-15 μg/mL), 495 μgh/mL (291-695 μgh/mL), 385 μgh/mL (242-528 μgh/mL) and 23% (15-28%), respectively. The medians of the AUC(0-24) and fAUC(0-24) to minimum inhibitory concentration ratios (AUC/MIC and fAUC/MIC) were 248 (144-347) and 192 (109-264), respectively. Two patients failed to achieve adequate levels of AUC/MIC and fAUC/MIC for linezolid. The percentage bound of linezolid in hypoalbuminaemic patients was significantly lower than in non-hypoalbuminaemic patients. A significant correlation was observed between fAUC(0-24) and creatinine clearance. In addition, the fAUC(0-24) was correlated with the minimum free concentration. In conclusion, the plasma level of free linezolid was variable in critically ill patients with renal dysfunction and hypoalbuminaemia. This finding suggests that the monitoring of free linezolid is necessary in critically ill patients.
在危重症患者中,游离利奈唑胺监测的临床意义尚未完全阐明。本研究旨在评估游离利奈唑胺药代动力学的变异性及其与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)敏感性的关系。纳入 20 例接受静脉注射利奈唑胺的危重症 MRSA 感染患者。在第 7 天给药后 12 小时进行采血。采集 0 至 24 小时的最小游离浓度、总游离利奈唑胺浓度时间曲线下面积(AUC(0-24)和游离 AUC(0-24))和结合率的中位数(四分位距)分别为 9.9μg/mL(5.2-15μg/mL)、495μgh/mL(291-695μgh/mL)、385μgh/mL(242-528μgh/mL)和 23%(15-28%)。AUC(0-24)和游离 AUC(0-24)与最低抑菌浓度比值(AUC/MIC 和游离 AUC/MIC)的中位数分别为 248(144-347)和 192(109-264)。有 2 例患者未能达到利奈唑胺 AUC/MIC 和游离 AUC/MIC 的充分水平。低白蛋白血症患者的利奈唑胺结合率明显低于非低白蛋白血症患者。游离 AUC(0-24)与肌酐清除率之间存在显著相关性。此外,游离 AUC(0-24)与最小游离浓度相关。总之,肾功能不全和低白蛋白血症的危重症患者游离利奈唑胺的血浆水平存在差异。这一发现表明,在危重症患者中监测游离利奈唑胺是必要的。