MEM Research Center, Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, Bern, 3014, Switzerland.
Eur Spine J. 2013 Sep;22 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):767-86. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2943-x. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
Since the Spine Tango registry was founded over a decade ago it has become established internationally. An annual report has been produced using the same format as the SWEspine group to allow for first data comparisons between the two registries.
Data was captured with the latest generation of surgery and follow-up forms. Also, the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) from interventions performed in the year 2012 with follow-up to June 2013 was analyzed. Groups of patients with the most common degenerative lumbar spine diseases and a single group of patients with degenerative cervical spine diseases were created. The demographics, risk factors, previous treatments, current treatment, short-term outcomes, patient satisfaction and complications were analyzed. Pre- and postoperative pain and function scores were derived from the COMI.
About 6,500 procedures were captured with Spine Tango in 2012. The definitions and composition of all the degenerative groups could not completely be matched between the two registries with the consequence that the age and sex distributions were partially different. Preoperative pain levels were similar. The short-term outcomes available did not allow for evaluation of the final result of surgical intervention. This will be possible with the longer term data in the next annual report. There was a distinct disparity in reported complication rates between surgeons and patients.
This is a valuable first step in creating comparable reports for SWEspine and Spine Tango. The German spine registry may be able to collaborate in the future because of similar items and data structure as Spine Tango. There needs to be more work on understanding the harmonization of the different degenerative subgroups. The Spine Tango report is weakened by the short and incomplete follow-up. The visual presentation of data may be a useful model for aiding decision making for surgeons and patients in the future.
自十多年前 Spine Tango 注册中心成立以来,它已在国际上确立了地位。我们使用与 SWEspine 集团相同的格式编写了年度报告,以便首次对这两个注册中心的数据进行比较。
使用最新一代的手术和随访表格来获取数据。此外,还对 2012 年进行的干预措施的核心结局测量指标(COMI)进行了分析,并随访至 2013 年 6 月。创建了最常见的退行性腰椎疾病患者组和退行性颈椎疾病患者单一组。分析了患者的人口统计学、风险因素、既往治疗、当前治疗、短期结果、患者满意度和并发症。从 COMI 中得出术前和术后疼痛和功能评分。
2012 年 Spine Tango 共收录了约 6500 例手术。由于两个注册中心的所有退行性疾病组的定义和组成无法完全匹配,因此年龄和性别分布部分不同。术前疼痛水平相似。目前可用的短期结果无法评估手术干预的最终结果。这将在未来年度报告的长期数据中实现。外科医生和患者报告的并发症发生率存在明显差异。
这是为 SWEspine 和 Spine Tango 创建可比报告的重要第一步。由于与 Spine Tango 具有相似的项目和数据结构,德国脊柱注册中心将来可能能够进行合作。需要进一步努力了解不同退行性亚组的协调问题。Spine Tango 报告因随访时间短且不完整而受到削弱。数据的可视化呈现可能是未来帮助外科医生和患者做出决策的有用模型。