• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过领导层与一线员工的互动改善患者护理:退伍军人事务部案例研究

Improving patient care through leadership engagement with frontline staff: a Department of Veterans Affairs case study.

作者信息

Singer Sara J, Rivard Peter E, Hayes Jennifer E, Shokeen Priti, Gaba David, Rosen Amy

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Aug;39(8):349-60. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39049-7.

DOI:10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39049-7
PMID:23991508
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Leveraging Frontline Expertise (LFLE) is a patient safety intervention for engaging senior managers with the work-systems challenges faced by frontline workers and ensuring follow-up and accountability for systemic change. A study was conducted to assess the ability to refine, implement, and demonstrate the effectiveness of LFLE, which was designed for and tested in private-sector hospitals, in a Department of Veterans Affairs medical center (VAMC), typically a more hierarchical setting.

METHODS

LFLE was pilot tested in an urban, East coast-based VAMC, which implemented LFLE in its emergency department and operating room, with the medical/surgical ward and ICU serving as controls. A 20-month multimethod evaluation involved interviews, observation, data-tracking forms, and surveys to measure participant perceptions of the program, operational benchmarks of effectiveness, and longitudinal change in safety climate.

RESULTS

Implementation showed fidelity to program design. Participating units identified 22 improvement opportunities, 16 (73%) of which were fully or partially resolved. Senior managers' attitudes toward LFLE were more positive than those of frontline staff, whose attitudes were mixed. Perceptions of safety climate deteriorated during the study period in the implementation units relative to controls.

DISCUSSION

LFLE can be implemented in the VA, yield work-system improvements, and increase alignment of improvement aims and actions across hierarchical levels. Yet the results also warn against dangers inherent in adapting improvement programs to new settings. Findings suggest the need for active listening and learning from frontline staff by senior managers and trust building across hierarchical

摘要

背景

利用一线专业知识(LFLE)是一项患者安全干预措施,旨在让高级管理人员参与应对一线工作人员所面临的工作系统挑战,并确保对系统性变革进行跟进和问责。本研究旨在评估LFLE在退伍军人事务部医疗中心(VAMC)(通常是一个层级性更强的机构)完善、实施及证明其有效性的能力,该措施是为私立医院设计并在私立医院进行过测试的。

方法

LFLE在位于东海岸城市的一家VAMC进行了试点测试,该中心在其急诊科和手术室实施了LFLE,将内科/外科病房和重症监护室作为对照。一项为期20个月的多方法评估包括访谈、观察、数据跟踪表和调查,以衡量参与者对该项目的看法、有效性的操作基准以及安全氛围的纵向变化。

结果

实施过程显示出与项目设计的一致性。参与单位确定了22个改进机会,其中16个(73%)已全部或部分得到解决。高级管理人员对LFLE的态度比一线工作人员更为积极,一线工作人员的态度则褒贬不一。与对照组相比,在研究期间,实施单位的安全氛围认知有所恶化。

讨论

LFLE可以在退伍军人事务部实施,带来工作系统的改进,并提高不同层级改进目标和行动的一致性。然而,结果也警示了在将改进项目应用于新环境时存在的固有风险。研究结果表明,高级管理人员需要积极倾听一线工作人员的意见并向他们学习,以及在不同层级间建立信任。

相似文献

1
Improving patient care through leadership engagement with frontline staff: a Department of Veterans Affairs case study.通过领导层与一线员工的互动改善患者护理:退伍军人事务部案例研究
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Aug;39(8):349-60. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39049-7.
2
The disparity of frontline clinical staff and managers' perceptions of a quality and patient safety initiative.一线临床工作人员和管理人员对一项质量和患者安全倡议的看法存在差异。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1184-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01506.x. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
3
Engaging Frontline Staff in Performance Improvement: The American Organization of Nurse Executives Implementation of Transforming Care at the Bedside Collaborative.让一线员工参与绩效改进:美国护士高管组织在床边实施变革护理协作项目
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Feb;42(2):61-9. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42007-6.
4
Implementing eScreening technology in four VA clinics: a mixed-method study.在四家退伍军人事务部诊所实施电子筛查技术:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4436-z.
5
Partnering With VA Stakeholders to Develop a Comprehensive Patient Safety Data Display: Lessons Learned From the Field.
Am J Med Qual. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):178-86. doi: 10.1177/1062860614560214. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
6
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of VA home-based primary care on American Indian reservations: a qualitative multi-case study.美国印第安人保留地实施 VA 家庭初级保健的障碍和促进因素:一项定性多案例研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Sep 2;12(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0632-6.
7
A two-pronged quality improvement training program for leaders and frontline staff.针对领导者和一线员工的双管齐下的质量改进培训计划。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Apr;37(4):147-53. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37018-3.
8
Fostering evidence-based quality improvement for patient-centered medical homes: Initiating local quality councils to transform primary care.促进以患者为中心的医疗之家的循证质量改进:启动地方质量委员会以转变初级保健。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2018 Apr/Jun;43(2):168-180. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000138.
9
Advancing theory on the multilevel role of leadership in the implementation of evidence-based health care practices.推进关于领导力在循证医疗实践实施中的多层次作用的理论。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2020 Apr/Jun;45(2):151-161. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000213.
10
Leveraging the Partnership for Patients' Initiative to Improve Patient Safety and Quality Within the Military Health System.利用患者合作计划来改善军事医疗系统内的患者安全与质量。
Mil Med. 2017 Mar;182(3):e1612-e1619. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00077.

引用本文的文献

1
Organizational readiness to change as a leverage point for improving safety: a national nursing home survey.组织变革准备度作为改善安全的杠杆点:一项全国性养老院调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 20;21(1):842. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06772-y.