Suppr超能文献

验证美国正畸委员会客观分级系统评估中国患者治疗效果的准确性。

Validation of the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System for assessing the treatment outcomes of Chinese patients.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Sep;144(3):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.018.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Orthodontics in China has developed rapidly, but there is no standard index of treatment outcomes. We assessed the validity of the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS) for the classification of treatment outcomes in Chinese patients.

METHODS

We randomly selected 108 patients who completed treatment between July 2005 and September 2008 in 6 orthodontic treatment centers across China. Sixty-nine experienced Chinese orthodontists made subjective assessments of the end-of-treatment casts for each patient. Three examiners then used the ABO-OGS to measure the casts. Pearson correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the correspondence between the ABO-OGS cast measurements and the orthodontists' subjective assessments.

RESULTS

The average subjective grading scores were highly correlated with the ABO-OGS scores (r = 0.7042). Four of the 7 study cast components of the ABO-OGS score-occlusal relationship, overjet, interproximal contact, and alignment-were statistically significantly correlated with the judges' subjective assessments. Together, these 4 accounted for 58% of the variability in the average subjective grading scores. The ABO-OGS cutoff score for cases that the judges deemed satisfactory was 16 points; the corresponding cutoff score for cases that the judges considered acceptable was 21 points.

CONCLUSIONS

The ABO-OGS is a valid index for the assessment of treatment outcomes in Chinese patients. By comparing the objective scores on this modification of the ABO-OGS with the mean subjective assessment of a panel of highly qualified Chinese orthodontists, a cutoff point for satisfactory treatment outcome was defined as 16 points or fewer, with scores of 16 to 21 points denoting less than satisfactory but still acceptable treatment. Cases that scored greater than 21 points were considered unacceptable.

摘要

简介

中国的正畸学发展迅速,但目前还没有治疗效果的标准指标。我们评估了美国正畸委员会客观分级系统(ABO-OGS)在中国患者治疗效果分类中的有效性。

方法

我们随机选择了 2005 年 7 月至 2008 年 9 月期间在中国 6 家正畸治疗中心完成治疗的 108 名患者。69 名经验丰富的中国正畸医生对每位患者的治疗结束模型进行了主观评估。然后,3 名检查者使用 ABO-OGS 对模型进行测量。采用 Pearson 相关分析和受试者工作特征曲线分析评估 ABO-OGS 模型测量值与正畸医生主观评估之间的一致性。

结果

平均主观分级评分与 ABO-OGS 评分高度相关(r = 0.7042)。ABO-OGS 评分的 7 个研究模型组成部分中的 4 个(咬合关系、覆颌、邻面接触和排齐)与评估者的主观评估具有统计学显著相关性。这 4 个部分共同解释了平均主观分级评分的 58%的变异性。评估者认为满意的病例 ABO-OGS 得分为 16 分;评估者认为可接受的病例 ABO-OGS 得分为 21 分。

结论

ABO-OGS 是评估中国患者治疗效果的有效指标。通过将该 ABO-OGS 修正版的客观评分与一组高素质中国正畸医生的平均主观评估进行比较,确定了令人满意的治疗效果的截止点为 16 分或更少,16 至 21 分表示治疗效果不太满意但仍可接受,而大于 21 分的病例则被认为不可接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验