Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(10):e396-406. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70311-5.
Therapeutic outcomes for patients with brain metastases need to improve. A critical review of trials specifically addressing brain metastases shows key issues that could prevent acceptance of results by regulatory agencies, including enrolment of heterogeneous groups of patients and varying definitions of clinical endpoints. Considerations specific to disease, modality, and treatment are not consistently addressed. Additionally, the schedule of CNS imaging and consequences of detection of new or progressive brain metastases in trials mainly exploring the extra-CNS activity of systemic drugs are highly variable. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group is an independent, international, collaborative effort to improve the design of trials in patients with brain tumours. In this two-part series, we review the state of clinical trials of brain metastases and suggest a consensus recommendation for the development of criteria for future clinical trials.
需要改善脑转移患者的治疗效果。对专门针对脑转移的试验进行的批判性回顾显示出一些关键问题,这些问题可能会导致监管机构不接受试验结果,包括患者群体的异质性和临床终点定义的差异。针对疾病、治疗方式和治疗的具体考虑因素并未得到一致解决。此外,在主要探索全身药物对中枢神经系统外活性的试验中,中枢神经系统成像的时间表以及新的或进展性脑转移检测的后果差异很大。神经肿瘤反应评估(RANO)工作组是一个独立的、国际性的、协作努力,旨在改善脑肿瘤患者试验的设计。在这两部分系列中,我们回顾了脑转移临床试验的现状,并为未来临床试验标准的制定提出了一项共识建议。