Suppr超能文献

神经肿瘤学临床试验中的疗效评估

Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Wen Patrick Y, Chang Susan M, Van den Bent Martin J, Vogelbaum Michael A, Macdonald David R, Lee Eudocia Q

机构信息

Patrick Y. Wen and Eudocia Q. Lee, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Susan M. Chang, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Michael A. Vogelbaum, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Martin J. Van den Bent, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and David R. Macdonald, London Regional Cancer Program, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 20;35(21):2439-2449. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7511. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

Abstract

Development of novel therapies for CNS tumors requires reliable assessment of response and progression. This requirement has been particularly challenging in neuro-oncology for which contrast enhancement serves as an imperfect surrogate for tumor volume and is influenced by agents that affect vascular permeability, such as antiangiogenic therapies. In addition, most tumors have a nonenhancing component that can be difficult to accurately quantify. To improve the response assessment in neuro-oncology and to standardize the criteria that are used for different CNS tumors, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group was established. This multidisciplinary international working group consists of neuro-oncologists, medical oncologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, neuropsychologists, and experts in clinical outcomes assessments, working in collaboration with government and industry to enhance the interpretation of clinical trials. The RANO working group was originally created to update response criteria for high- and low-grade gliomas and to address such issues as pseudoresponse and nonenhancing tumor progression from antiangiogenic therapies, and pseudoprogression from radiochemotherapy. RANO has expanded to include working groups that are focused on other tumors, including brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, spine tumors, pediatric brain tumors, and meningiomas, as well as other clinical trial end points, such as clinical outcomes assessments, seizures, corticosteroid use, and positron emission tomography imaging. In an effort to standardize the measurement of neurologic function for clinical assessment, the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology scale was drafted. Born out of a workshop conducted by the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition and the US Food and Drug Administration, a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol now exists to reduce variability and improve reliability. Efforts by RANO have been widely accepted and are increasingly being used in neuro-oncology trials, although additional refinements will be needed.

摘要

开发针对中枢神经系统肿瘤的新型疗法需要对反应和进展进行可靠评估。这一要求在神经肿瘤学中尤其具有挑战性,因为对比增强作为肿瘤体积的替代指标并不完美,且会受到影响血管通透性的药物(如抗血管生成疗法)的影响。此外,大多数肿瘤都有一个难以准确量化的非增强成分。为了改善神经肿瘤学中的反应评估并规范用于不同中枢神经系统肿瘤的标准,成立了神经肿瘤学反应评估(RANO)工作组。这个多学科国际工作组由神经肿瘤学家、医学肿瘤学家、神经放射学家、神经外科医生、放射肿瘤学家、神经心理学家以及临床结局评估专家组成,他们与政府和行业合作,以加强对临床试验的解读。RANO工作组最初的创建目的是更新高级别和低级别胶质瘤的反应标准,并解决诸如抗血管生成疗法导致的假反应和非增强肿瘤进展以及放化疗导致的假进展等问题。RANO已扩展到包括专注于其他肿瘤的工作组,如脑转移瘤、软脑膜转移瘤、脊柱肿瘤、儿童脑肿瘤和脑膜瘤,以及其他临床试验终点,如临床结局评估、癫痫发作、皮质类固醇使用和正电子发射断层扫描成像。为了规范用于临床评估的神经功能测量,起草了神经肿瘤学神经评估量表。在启动脑肿瘤药物开发联盟和美国食品药品监督管理局举办的一次研讨会上,现已形成了一个标准化的脑肿瘤成像方案,以减少变异性并提高可靠性。RANO的努力已被广泛接受,并越来越多地用于神经肿瘤学试验,不过仍需要进一步完善。

相似文献

1
Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials.神经肿瘤学临床试验中的疗效评估
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 20;35(21):2439-2449. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7511. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
2
Imaging Criteria in Neuro-oncology.神经肿瘤学中的影像学标准
Semin Neurol. 2018 Feb;38(1):24-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1627468. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
3
Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria and Clinical Endpoints.神经肿瘤学标准中的疗效评估与临床终点
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2016 Nov;24(4):705-718. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
4
Assessment of Brain Tumor Response: RANO and Its Offspring.脑肿瘤反应评估:RANO及其衍生标准
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):35. doi: 10.1007/s11864-016-0413-5.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Emerging targeted therapies for glioma.神经胶质瘤的新兴靶向治疗方法。
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2016 Dec;21(4):441-452. doi: 10.1080/14728214.2016.1257609. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验