• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

H 线圈和 8 字形线圈在不同深度刺激运动皮层的效果。联合运动阈值和电场分布研究。

Motor cortex activation by H-coil and figure-8 coil at different depths. Combined motor threshold and electric field distribution study.

机构信息

Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.

Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Feb;125(2):336-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.013
PMID:23994191
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the ability of an H-coil and figure-8 coil to stimulate different motor cortex regions.

METHODS

The resting (rMT) and active (aMT) motor thresholds were measured for the right hand APB and leg AHB muscles in 10 subjects, using an H-coil and a figure-8 coil. The electric field distribution induced by the coils was measured in a head model. The combination of the hand and leg MTs with the field measurements was used to determine the depth of hand and leg motor areas via the intersection points.

RESULTS

The rMT and aMT of both APB and AHB were significantly lower for the H-coil. The ratio and difference between the leg and hand rMT and aMT were significantly lower for the H-Coil. Electric field measurements revealed significantly more favorable depth profile and larger volume of stimulation for the H-coil. The averaged intersection for the APB was at a distance from coil of 1.83±0.54cm and at an intensity of 97.8±21.4V/m, while for the AHB it was at a distance of 2.73±0.44cm and at an intensity of 118.6±21.3V/m.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest a more efficient activation of deeper motor cortical regions using the H-coil.

SIGNIFICANCE

The combined evaluation of MTs by H- and figure-8 coils allows measurement of the individual depth of different motor cortex regions. This could be helpful for optimizing stimulation parameters for TMS treatment.

摘要

目的

比较 H 线圈和 8 字形线圈刺激不同运动皮层区域的能力。

方法

在 10 名受试者中,使用 H 线圈和 8 字形线圈测量右手 APB 和腿部 AHB 肌肉的静息(rMT)和活动(aMT)运动阈值。在头模型中测量线圈引起的电场分布。通过交点确定手和腿运动区的深度,将手和腿 MT 与场测量相结合。

结果

H 线圈的 rMT 和 aMT 均显著低于 APB 和 AHB。H 线圈的腿与手 rMT 和 aMT 的比值和差值均显著降低。电场测量显示 H 线圈具有更有利的深度分布和更大的刺激体积。APB 的平均交点距离线圈为 1.83±0.54cm,强度为 97.8±21.4V/m,而 AHB 的平均交点距离线圈为 2.73±0.44cm,强度为 118.6±21.3V/m。

结论

结果表明 H 线圈更有效地激活更深的运动皮层区域。

意义

H 线圈和 8 字形线圈联合测量 MT 可测量不同运动皮层区域的个体深度。这对于优化 TMS 治疗的刺激参数可能会有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Motor cortex activation by H-coil and figure-8 coil at different depths. Combined motor threshold and electric field distribution study.H 线圈和 8 字形线圈在不同深度刺激运动皮层的效果。联合运动阈值和电场分布研究。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Feb;125(2):336-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
2
H-coil: Induced electric field properties and input/output curves on healthy volunteers, comparison with a standard figure-of-eight coil.H型线圈:健康志愿者的感应电场特性及输入/输出曲线,与标准8字形线圈的比较
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;120(6):1174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.176. Epub 2009 May 9.
3
Rotational field TMS: Comparison with conventional TMS based on motor evoked potentials and thresholds in the hand and leg motor cortices.旋转磁场 TMS:与基于手部和腿部运动皮质的运动诱发电位和阈值的传统 TMS 的比较。
Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):900-907. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation: the role of coil geometry and tissue depth.小脑经颅磁刺激:线圈几何形状与组织深度的作用
Brain Stimul. 2014 Sep-Oct;7(5):643-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 6.
5
Representation of cricothyroid muscles at the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy subjects, mapped by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS).健康受试者经颅磁刺激导航(nTMS)定位初级运动皮层(M1)的环甲肌代表区。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Nov;123(11):2205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 May 22.
6
Stimulating deep cortical structures with the batwing coil: how to determine the intensity for transcranial magnetic stimulation using coil-cortex distance.使用蝙蝠翼线圈刺激深部皮质结构:如何使用线圈-皮质距离来确定经颅磁刺激的强度。
J Neurosci Methods. 2012 Mar 15;204(2):238-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.11.020. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
7
Atlas of optimal coil orientation and position for TMS: A computational study.经颅磁刺激线圈优化取向与位置图谱:一项计算研究。
Brain Stimul. 2018 Jul-Aug;11(4):839-848. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
8
Where and what TMS activates: Experiments and modeling.TMS 的激活部位和激活区域:实验与建模。
Brain Stimul. 2018 Jan-Feb;11(1):166-174. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
9
The effect of coil type and limb dominance in the assessment of lower-limb motor cortex excitability using TMS.线圈类型和肢体优势对 TMS 评估下肢运动皮层兴奋性的影响。
Neurosci Lett. 2019 Apr 23;699:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.01.050. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
10
The influence of coil-skull distance on transcranial magnetic stimulation motor-evoked responses.线圈与颅骨距离对经颅磁刺激运动诱发电位的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jan;192(1):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1552-0. Epub 2008 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
An update on non-pharmacological interventions for pain relief.疼痛缓解的非药物干预最新进展。
Cell Rep Med. 2025 Feb 18;6(2):101940. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.101940.
2
Clinical Efficacy of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric and Cognitive Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review.深部经颅磁刺激治疗精神和认知障碍的临床疗效:系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 May 26;12:e45213. doi: 10.2196/45213.
3
Revisiting the Rotational Field TMS Method for Neurostimulation.重新审视用于神经刺激的旋转场经颅磁刺激方法。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 27;12(3):983. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030983.
4
Detailed measurements and simulations of electric field distribution of two TMS coils cleared for obsessive compulsive disorder in the brain and in specific regions associated with OCD.对用于治疗强迫症的大脑和与 OCD 相关特定区域的两个 TMS 线圈的电场分布进行详细测量和模拟。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 30;17(8):e0263145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263145. eCollection 2022.
5
Neurostimulation for the treatment of functional neurological disorder: A systematic review.神经刺激治疗功能性神经障碍:一项系统综述。
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2021 Nov 9;16:100501. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100501. eCollection 2021.
6
Exploratory study of optimal parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuropathic pain in the lower extremities.重复经颅磁刺激治疗下肢神经性疼痛最佳参数的探索性研究
Pain Rep. 2021 Oct 13;6(4):e964. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000964. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
7
Factors affecting the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with Alzheimer's disease.影响重复经颅磁刺激治疗阿尔茨海默病患者疗效的因素。
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Jun 25;50(3):383-389. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2021-0184.
8
Systems Neuroengineering: Understanding and Interacting with the Brain.系统神经工程学:理解大脑并与之交互
Engineering (Beijing). 2015 Sep;1(3):292-308. doi: 10.15302/j-eng-2015078. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
9
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a potential treatment approach for cannabis use disorder.重复经颅磁刺激作为一种治疗大麻使用障碍的潜在方法。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 13;109:110290. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110290. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
Characterizing off-target corticospinal responses to double-cone transcranial magnetic stimulation.描述双锥颅磁刺激的皮质脊髓非靶标反应。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Apr;239(4):1099-1110. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06044-5. Epub 2021 Feb 6.