Feitosa Victor Pinheiro, Bazzocchi Maria Giulia, Putignano Angelo, Orsini Giovanna, Luzi Arlinda Luzi, Sinhoreti Mário Alexandre Coelho, Watson Timothy F, Sauro Salvatore
Division of Dental Materials, Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, Brazil.
J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):1068-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
To compare the effects of two etching procedures using meta-phosphoric (MPA) or ortho-phosphoric acid (OPA) on dentine demineralisation, resin-dentine bonds durability and interface nanoleakage/ultra-morphology.
Middle-dentine specimens were etched using 37% OPA (15s) or 40% MPA (60s) and submitted to infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) or ultra-morphology dye-assisted (calcium-staining) confocal microscopy (Ca-CLSM). A three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive was formulated, applied onto dentine and light-cured for 30s before composite build-up. After 24h, the dentine-bonded specimens were cut into 1mm(2) beams; half were immediately submitted to microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and half stored in DW for six months. The μTBS results were analysed with repeated-measures ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Further teeth were bonded and prepared for interface nanoleakage/ultra-morphology confocal evaluation.
FTIR and Ca-CLSM analyses showed dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (Brushite) precipitation in MPA-etched dentine and on the bottom (front of demineralisation) of the OPA-etched dentine. Statistical analysis showed similar μTBS for both etching procedures after 24h. The μTBS of specimens in OPA-group dropped significantly (p<0.05) after six month; the specimens in the MPA group showed no statistically difference (p>0.05). CLSM depicted no evident sign of nanoleakage within the resin-dentine interface of the MPA-treated specimens, while the specimens in OPA-group presented intense nanoleakage and interface degradation.
The use of MPA (60s) as an alternative dentine conditioning agent in etch-and-rinse bonding procedures may be a suitable strategy to create more durable resin-dentine bonds.
比较使用间磷酸(MPA)或正磷酸(OPA)的两种酸蚀程序对牙本质脱矿、树脂-牙本质粘结耐久性及界面微渗漏/超微形态的影响。
用37% OPA(15秒)或40% MPA(60秒)对中层牙本质标本进行酸蚀,然后进行红外光谱(FTIR)或超微形态染料辅助(钙染色)共聚焦显微镜(Ca-CLSM)检查。配制一种三步酸蚀冲洗粘结剂,涂覆于牙本质上并光固化30秒,然后进行复合树脂充填。24小时后,将粘结牙本质的标本切成1mm(2)的薄片;一半立即进行微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)测试,另一半在蒸馏水中储存6个月。μTBS结果采用重复测量方差分析和Tukey检验(p<0.05)进行分析。对更多牙齿进行粘结并准备进行界面微渗漏/超微形态共聚焦评估。
FTIR和Ca-CLSM分析显示,MPA酸蚀的牙本质以及OPA酸蚀牙本质底部(脱矿前沿)有二水磷酸二钙(透钙磷石)沉淀。统计分析显示,24小时后两种酸蚀程序的μTBS相似。OPA组标本在6个月后μTBS显著下降(p<0.05);MPA组标本无统计学差异(p>0.05)。CLSM显示,MPA处理标本的树脂-牙本质界面内无明显微渗漏迹象,而OPA组标本出现强烈微渗漏和界面降解。
在酸蚀冲洗粘结程序中使用MPA(60秒)作为替代牙本质预处理剂,可能是形成更持久树脂-牙本质粘结的合适策略。