• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Do trained specialists solicit familial authorization at equal frequency, regardless of deceased donor characteristics?无论已故捐赠者的特征如何,训练有素的专家是否以相同频率征求家属授权?
Prog Transplant. 2013 Sep;23(3):290-6. doi: 10.7182/pit2013406.
2
Attitudes and acceptance of First Person Authorization: a national comparison of donor and nondonor families.第一人称授权的态度和接受度:供体和非供体家庭的全国性比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jan;74(1):294-300. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318270dafc.
3
Resource utilization associated with procurement of transplantable organs from donors that do not meet OPTN eligible death criteria.不符合 OPTN 资格死亡标准的供体器官采购的资源利用情况。
Transplantation. 2014 May 27;97(10):1043-8. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000441093.32217.cb.
4
Public policy governing organ and tissue procurement in the United States. Results from the National Organ and Tissue Procurement Study.美国关于器官和组织采购的公共政策。国家器官和组织采购研究的结果。
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Jul 1;123(1):10-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-1-199507010-00037.
5
The Impact of Ethnicity on Research Authorization at the Time of Organ Donation: A Single-Center Experience Among Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.种族对器官捐赠时研究授权的影响:单中心已故供体肾移植经验
Turkish J Nephrol. 2023 Oct;32(4):361-366. doi: 10.5152/turkjnephrol.2023.23582. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
6
Disparities in Deceased Organ Donor Research Authorization: Experience at One Organ Procurement Organization and Call for National Conversations.已故器官捐献者研究授权方面的差异:一个器官获取组织的经验及全国性对话的呼吁。
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Jun 26;6(9):2331-2337. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.06.017. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Differences in willingness to donate cadaveric organ between young donor families and adult donor families: evidence from the Hunan Province, China.年轻供体家庭和成年供体家庭在捐献尸体器官意愿方面的差异:来自中国湖南省的证据。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(15):2830-3.
8
A Comparison of the Request Process and Outcomes in Adult and Pediatric Organ Donation.成人与儿童器官捐献的申请流程及结果比较
Pediatrics. 2015 Jul;136(1):e108-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3652. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
9
Effect of organ donor race on health team procurement efforts.器官捐献者种族对医疗团队获取工作的影响。
Arch Surg. 1993 Dec;128(12):1331-5; discussion 1335.
10
Maximizing the use of potential donors through increased rates of family approach for authorization.通过增加家庭授权途径来最大限度地利用潜在供体。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Dec;22(12):2834-2841. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17194. Epub 2022 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Organ Procurement Organization Approach of ICU Families in Person Versus by Phone for Donation Authorization.器官获取组织针对重症监护病房(ICU)患者家属进行亲自沟通与电话沟通以获取捐赠授权的方法。
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Jun 11;7(6):e1277. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001277. eCollection 2025 Jun 1.
2
Canadian Guidelines for Controlled Pediatric Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death-Summary Report.加拿大循环判定死亡后小儿器官捐献指南-概要报告。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;18(11):1035-1046. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001320.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to obtaining family consent for potential organ donors.获取潜在器官捐赠者家庭同意的障碍。
J Trauma. 2010 Feb;68(2):447-51. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181caab8f.
2
The instability of organ donation decisions by next-of-kin and factors that predict it.亲属做出的器官捐赠决定的不稳定性及其预测因素。
Am J Transplant. 2008 Dec;8(12):2661-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02429.x. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
3
US organ donation breakthrough collaborative increases organ donation.美国器官捐赠突破性合作组织增加了器官捐赠。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2008 Jul-Sep;31(3):190-210. doi: 10.1097/01.CNQ.0000325044.78904.9b.
4
The effects of donor and recipient practices on transplant center finances.供体和受体操作对移植中心财务状况的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2008 Mar;8(3):586-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02098.x.
5
Improving consent rates for organ donation: the effect of an inhouse coordinator program.提高器官捐赠的同意率:内部协调员项目的效果。
J Trauma. 2007 Jun;62(6):1411-4; discussion 1414-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180479876.
6
Timely referral of potential organ donors.潜在器官捐献者的及时转诊。
Crit Care Nurse. 2006 Apr;26(2):88-93.
7
Organ donation decision: comparison of donor and nondonor families.器官捐赠决策:捐赠者家庭与非捐赠者家庭的比较
Am J Transplant. 2006 Jan;6(1):190-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01130.x.
8
Location of in-house organ procurement organization staff in level I trauma centers increases conversion of potential donors to actual donors.一级创伤中心内部器官获取组织工作人员的驻点可提高潜在捐赠者向实际捐赠者的转化率。
Transplantation. 2003 Apr 27;75(8):1330-5. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000060532.70301.32.
9
Factors influencing families' consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation.影响家庭同意捐赠实体器官用于移植的因素。
JAMA. 2001 Jul 4;286(1):71-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.1.71.
10
Improving the request process to increase family consent for organ donation.改进申请流程以提高家属对器官捐赠的同意率。
J Transpl Coord. 1998 Dec;8(4):210-7. doi: 10.7182/prtr.1.8.4.2g64j1x161620765.

无论已故捐赠者的特征如何,训练有素的专家是否以相同频率征求家属授权?

Do trained specialists solicit familial authorization at equal frequency, regardless of deceased donor characteristics?

作者信息

Dubay Derek A, Redden David T, Haque Akhlaque, Gray Stephen H, Fouad Mona, Kohler Connie, Taylor Garry, Eckhoff Devin E

机构信息

University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

Prog Transplant. 2013 Sep;23(3):290-6. doi: 10.7182/pit2013406.

DOI:10.7182/pit2013406
PMID:23996950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3915045/
Abstract

CONTEXT

The Organ Donor Breakthrough Collaborative recommended high-leverage changes including "master effective requesting.

OBJECTIVE

To measure who approaches decedent families to request organ donation and to determine whether trained specialists will solicit authorization at equal frequency regardless of donor characteristics.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of data from 2006 to 2009 in an organ center's donor database. Decedents were stratified into 2 groups: those that met the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network's eligible death criteria (ED donors) and those that did not (not eligible death [NED] donors).

RESULTS

Of decedents whose families were approached for authorization, 46% were ED donors and 54% were NED donors. Trained specialists solicited authorization from 76% of the total population but were more likely to solicit authorization from ED donors than NED donors (86% vs 68%, P<.001). Trained specialists were more likely to solicit authorization from donors whose cause of death was overrepresented in ED donors and donors less than 50 years old. Trained specialists were more likely than others to obtain authorization from families of all donors. Multivariable modeling demonstrated that having a trained specialist approach the decedent's family was associated with the highest odds of obtaining authorization.

CONCLUSIONS

Trained specialists approached most families of decedents for authorization, but disproportionately approached fewer families of NED donors. Having a trained specialist approach the decedent family has the strongest impact on obtaining donor authorization. These data suggest that fewer resources are allocated to NED donors, which may adversely affect the supply of deceased donor organs.

摘要

背景

器官捐赠突破协作组织推荐了高影响力的变革措施,包括“掌握有效的请求技巧”。

目的

评估谁向死者家属请求器官捐赠,并确定经过培训的专业人员是否会不论捐赠者特征,以相同频率征求授权。

方法

对某器官中心2006年至2009年捐赠者数据库中的数据进行回顾性分析。死者被分为两组:符合器官获取与移植网络合格死亡标准的(合格死亡捐赠者[ED捐赠者])和不符合该标准的(非合格死亡[NED]捐赠者)。

结果

在其家属被征求授权的死者中,46%为ED捐赠者,54%为NED捐赠者。经过培训的专业人员向76%的总人群征求了授权,但从ED捐赠者处征求授权的可能性高于NED捐赠者(86%对68%,P<0.001)。经过培训的专业人员更有可能从那些死亡原因在ED捐赠者中占比过高的捐赠者以及年龄小于50岁的捐赠者处征求授权。经过培训的专业人员比其他人更有可能从所有捐赠者的家属处获得授权。多变量建模表明,让经过培训的专业人员与死者家属接触与获得授权的最高几率相关。

结论

经过培训的专业人员向大多数死者家属征求授权,但不成比例地较少接触NED捐赠者的家属。让经过培训的专业人员与死者家属接触对获得捐赠者授权的影响最大。这些数据表明分配给NED捐赠者的资源较少,这可能会对已故捐赠者器官的供应产生不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ff6/3915045/f929b0d98b6f/nihms551028f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ff6/3915045/1bb3d2491f7a/nihms551028f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ff6/3915045/10f8d81a2faa/nihms551028f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ff6/3915045/e020d151b1ba/nihms551028f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ff6/3915045/f929b0d98b6f/nihms551028f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ff6/3915045/1bb3d2491f7a/nihms551028f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ff6/3915045/10f8d81a2faa/nihms551028f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ff6/3915045/e020d151b1ba/nihms551028f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ff6/3915045/f929b0d98b6f/nihms551028f4.jpg