Daliento L, Rizzoli G, Thiene G, Nava A, Rinuncini M, Chioin R, Dalla Volta S
Department of Cardiology, University of Padua Medical School, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 1990 Sep 15;66(7):741-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)91141-r.
Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of cineangiography were evaluated by multivariate logistic discriminant analysis in 32 patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular (RV) cardiomyopathy, 27 patients with biventricular dilated cardiomyopathy, 28 patients with atrial septal defect and 18 normal subjects. In patients with arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy and biventricular dilated cardiomyopathy, the diagnosis was confirmed by endomyocardial biopsy. All RV values overlapped for the diagnosis of atrial septal defect and arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy; overlapping extended to dilated cardiomyopathy for end-diastolic volume and infundibular dimensions. RV ejection fraction appeared reduced in all the diseases; in particular, mean values in dilated cardiomyopathy and arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy were 38 and 53%, respectively (p less than 0.05). Left ventricular quantitative studies showed a significant difference between dilated and arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy, both in terms of pumping indexes (mean end-diastolic volumes 180 vs 91 ml/m2 and mean ejection fraction 33 vs 60%), and indexes of contractility (stress/end-diastolic volume 3.7 vs 6.7). Multivariate analysis disclosed that transversally arranged hypertrophic trabeculae, separated by deep fissures, were associated with the highest probability of arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy (p less than 0.001). Posterior subtricuspid and anterior infundibular wall bulgings were the only other independently significant variables. Coexistence of these signs was associated with 96% specificity and 87.5% sensitivity. Thus, arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy presents quantitative volumetric and hemodynamic as well as qualitative features that clearly distinguish it from dilated cardiomyopathy and confirm its nosographic autonomy among the primary diseases of the myocardium.
通过多变量逻辑判别分析,对32例致心律失常性右心室(RV)心肌病患者、27例双心室扩张型心肌病患者、28例房间隔缺损患者和18名正常受试者进行了心血管造影的诊断敏感性和特异性评估。在致心律失常性RV心肌病和双心室扩张型心肌病患者中,通过心内膜活检确诊。对于房间隔缺损和致心律失常性RV心肌病的诊断,所有RV值均有重叠;舒张末期容积和漏斗部尺寸的重叠延伸至扩张型心肌病。所有疾病中RV射血分数均降低;特别是,扩张型心肌病和致心律失常性RV心肌病的平均值分别为38%和53%(p<0.05)。左心室定量研究显示,扩张型和致心律失常性RV心肌病在泵血指标(平均舒张末期容积180 vs 91 ml/m2和平均射血分数33 vs 60%)和收缩性指标(应力/舒张末期容积3.7 vs 6.7)方面存在显著差异。多变量分析显示,由深裂隙分隔的横向排列的肥厚小梁与致心律失常性RV心肌病的最高概率相关(p<0.001)。三尖瓣后和漏斗部前壁膨出是唯一其他独立的显著变量。这些体征的共存具有96%的特异性和87.5%的敏感性。因此,致心律失常性RV心肌病呈现出定量的容积和血流动力学以及定性特征,使其与扩张型心肌病明显区分开来,并证实了其在原发性心肌疾病中的疾病分类自主性。