Fallenberg E M, Dimitrijevic L, Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Kettritz U, Poellinger A, Bick U, Winzer K J, Engelken F, Renz D M
Clinic of Radiology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin.
Institute of diagnostic and interventional Radiology, DRK-Kliniken Berlin-Mitte, Berlin.
Rofo. 2014 Mar;186(3):274-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350572. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
To evaluate the additional benefit of true geometric (air-gap) magnification views for the characterization of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
After ethical approval, we retrospectively reviewed patient records to identify 100 patients with suspicious microcalcifications (35 malignant, 65 benign) who had a standard digital mammography and an additional digital magnification view in the same projection within three months. All images were obtained using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital system (Senographe 2000 D, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, UK). Images were independently analyzed by six board-certified radiologists. The probability of malignancy was estimated using first standard contact mammography alone (MG) and then mammography in combination with the magnification view (MG+MAG) using a modified Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification system and a percentage scale. Results were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In addition, readers assessed the subjective visibility of the calcifications.
For all six readers combined, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.664 ± 0.052 for MG and 0.813 ± 0.042 for MG + MAG, resulting in a statistically significant improvement of 0.148 ± 0.120. Each reader had a higher AUC for MG + MAG than MG, with the improvement being statistically significant in four of the six readers. In 76.34 % of the cases, MG + MAG resulted in better visibility of calcifications compared with mammography alone. In 33 % slightly more and in 39 % significantly more calcifications were found.
Even in digital mammography with the option of using electronic magnification (zoom) at the viewing workstation, true geometric (air-gap) magnification views remain important for the visibility and correct classification of microcalcifications and for the assessment of their extent.
评估在数字乳腺摄影中,真几何(气隙)放大视图对微钙化特征描述的额外益处。
经伦理批准后,我们回顾性审查患者记录,以确定100例有可疑微钙化的患者(35例恶性,65例良性),这些患者在三个月内进行了标准数字乳腺摄影,并在同一投照方向上额外进行了数字放大视图检查。所有图像均使用基于非晶硅的全场数字系统(Senographe 2000 D,GE医疗集团,英国查尔方特圣贾尔斯)获得。图像由六位获得委员会认证的放射科医生独立分析。使用改良的乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类系统和百分比量表,先单独使用标准接触式乳腺摄影(MG),然后结合放大视图使用乳腺摄影(MG+MAG)来估计恶性概率。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)分析比较结果。此外,阅片者评估钙化的主观可见性。
对于所有六位阅片者而言,MG的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.664±0.052,MG+MAG的曲线下面积为0.813±0.042,统计学上有显著改善,改善值为0.148±0.120。每位阅片者的MG+MAG的AUC均高于MG,六位阅片者中有四位的改善具有统计学意义。在76.34%的病例中,与单独乳腺摄影相比,MG+MAG能使钙化的可见性更好。发现钙化数量略有增加的病例占33%,显著增加的病例占39%。
即使在数字乳腺摄影中,可在阅片工作站使用电子放大(变焦)功能,真几何(气隙)放大视图对于微钙化的可见性、正确分类及其范围评估仍然很重要。