Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, New York 11794-2500, USA.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2013 Sep;50(3):376-80. doi: 10.1037/a0032158.
In conceptualizing CBT as an approach to treatment that is closely linked to basic empirical principles of human behavior, it is possible to incorporate evidence-based contributions from different theoretical orientations. This is illustrated by how CBT can be open to a variety of interventions that are not typically associated with CBT, but which nonetheless have empirical support. This article describes the following clinical interventions, together with their theoretical rationale and empirical support: (a) Having a therapeutic focus on what is occurring within the session itself, (b) Becoming aware of one's negative reactions toward the patient and transforming them into a more compassionate stance, and (c) Using procedures for enhancing emotional arousal in changing a patient's cognitive-affective distortions.
在将 CBT 概念化为一种与人类行为基本经验原则密切相关的治疗方法时,就有可能将不同理论取向的循证贡献结合起来。这可以通过 CBT 如何接受各种通常与 CBT 无关但具有经验支持的干预措施来说明。本文描述了以下临床干预措施,以及它们的理论依据和经验支持:(a)将治疗重点放在会话本身内部发生的事情上,(b)意识到自己对患者的负面反应,并将其转化为更富有同情心的立场,以及(c)使用增强情绪唤醒的程序来改变患者的认知情感扭曲。