Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Gordon Center for Integrative Science, The University of Chicago , 929 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.
J Am Chem Soc. 2013 Oct 2;135(39):14741-53. doi: 10.1021/ja405939x. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
Gleevec, a well-known cancer therapeutic agent, is an effective inhibitor of several tyrosine kinases, including Abl and c-Kit, but displays less potency to inhibit closely homologous tyrosine kinases, such as Lck and c-Src. Because many structural features of the binding site are highly conserved in these homologous kinases, the molecular determinants responsible for the binding specificity of Gleevec remain poorly understood. To address this issue, free energy perturbation molecular dynamics (FEP/MD) simulations with explicit solvent was used to compute the binding affinity of Gleevec to Abl, c-Kit, Lck, and c-Src. The results of the FEP/MD calculations are in good agreement with experiments, enabling a detailed and quantitative dissection of the absolute binding free energy in terms of various thermodynamic contributions affecting the binding specificity of Gleevec to the kinases. Dominant binding free energy contributions arises from the van der Waals dispersive interaction, compensating about two-thirds of the unfavorable free energy penalty associated with the loss of translational, rotational, and conformational freedom of the ligand upon binding. In contrast, the contributions from electrostatic and repulsive interactions nearly cancel out due to solvent effects. Furthermore, the calculations show the importance of the conformation of the kinase activation loop. Among the kinases examined, Abl provides the most favorable binding environment for Gleevec via optimal protein-ligand interactions and a small free energy cost for loss of the translational, rotational, and conformational freedom upon ligand binding. The FEP/MD calculations additionally reveal that Lck and c-Src provide similar nonbinding interactions with the bound-Gleevec, but the former pays less entropic penalty for the ligand losing its translational, rotational, and conformational motions to bind, examining the empirically observed differential binding affinities of Gleevec between the two Src-family kinases.
格列卫是一种著名的癌症治疗药物,它是几种酪氨酸激酶的有效抑制剂,包括 Abl 和 c-Kit,但对密切相关的酪氨酸激酶,如 Lck 和 c-Src 的抑制作用较弱。由于这些同源激酶的结合位点的许多结构特征高度保守,因此格列卫结合特异性的分子决定因素仍知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,使用包含溶剂的自由能微扰分子动力学(FEP/MD)模拟来计算格列卫与 Abl、c-Kit、Lck 和 c-Src 的结合亲和力。FEP/MD 计算的结果与实验结果非常吻合,使我们能够根据影响格列卫与激酶结合特异性的各种热力学贡献,对绝对结合自由能进行详细和定量的剖析。主要的结合自由能贡献来自范德华色散相互作用,补偿了与配体结合时失去平移、旋转和构象自由度相关的不利自由能罚分的三分之二左右。相比之下,由于溶剂效应,静电和排斥相互作用的贡献几乎相互抵消。此外,计算表明激酶激活环构象的重要性。在所检查的激酶中,Abl 通过最佳的蛋白-配体相互作用和配体结合时平移、旋转和构象自由度损失的较小自由能成本,为格列卫提供了最有利的结合环境。FEP/MD 计算还表明,Lck 和 c-Src 与结合的格列卫提供了相似的非结合相互作用,但前者为配体失去平移、旋转和构象运动以结合付出的熵罚较小,这解释了经验观察到的格列卫与两种Src 家族激酶之间的差异结合亲和力。