• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用全科医疗网络改善2型糖尿病患者的治疗效果:伦敦东部的一项质量改进项目。

Improving outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes using general practice networks: a quality improvement project in east London.

作者信息

Hull Sally, Chowdhury Tahseen A, Mathur Rohini, Robson John

机构信息

Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary, University of London, , London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Feb;23(2):171-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002008. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002008
PMID:24003237
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Structured diabetes care can improve outcomes and reduce risk of complications, but improving care in a deprived, ethnically diverse area can prove challenging. This report evaluates a system change to enhance diabetes care delivery in a primary care setting.

METHODS

All 35 practices in one inner London Primary Care Trust were geographically grouped into eight networks of four to five practices, each supported by a network manager, clerical staff and an educational budget. A multidisciplinary team developed a 'care package' for type 2 diabetes management, with financial incentives based on network achievement of targets. Monthly electronic performance dashboards enabled networks to track and improve performance. Network multidisciplinary team meetings including the diabetic specialist team supported case management and education. Key measures for improvement included the number of diabetes care plans completed, proportion of patients attending for digital retinal screen and proportions of patients achieving a number of biomedical indices (blood pressure, cholesterol, glycated haemoglobin).

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2012, completed care plans rose from 10% to 88%. The proportion of patients attending for digital retinal screen rose from 72% to 82.8%. The proportion of patients achieving a combination of blood pressure ≤ 140/80 mm Hg and cholesterol ≤ 4 mmol/L rose from 35.3% to 46.1%. Mean glycated haemoglobin dropped from 7.80% to 7.66% (62-60 mmol/mol).

CONCLUSIONS

Investment of financial, organisational and education resources into primary care practice networks can achieve clinically important improvements in diabetes care in deprived, ethnically diverse communities. This success is predicated on collaborative working between practices, purposively designed high-quality information on network performance and engagement between primary and secondary care clinicians.

摘要

背景

结构化糖尿病护理可改善治疗效果并降低并发症风险,但在贫困、种族多样的地区改善护理可能具有挑战性。本报告评估了一项系统变革,以加强初级保健机构中的糖尿病护理服务。

方法

伦敦市中心一个初级保健信托基金的所有35家医疗机构按地理位置划分为8个网络,每个网络由4至5家医疗机构组成,每个网络由一名网络经理、文书工作人员和一项教育预算提供支持。一个多学科团队制定了一套2型糖尿病管理的“护理套餐”,并根据网络目标的达成情况给予经济激励。每月的电子绩效仪表盘使各网络能够跟踪和改善绩效。包括糖尿病专科团队在内的网络多学科团队会议支持病例管理和教育。改善的关键指标包括完成的糖尿病护理计划数量、接受数字视网膜筛查的患者比例以及达到多项生物医学指标(血压、胆固醇、糖化血红蛋白)的患者比例。

结果

2009年至2012年间,完成的护理计划从10%增至88%。接受数字视网膜筛查的患者比例从72%增至82.8%。血压≤140/80毫米汞柱且胆固醇≤4毫摩尔/升的患者比例从35.3%增至46.1%。平均糖化血红蛋白从7.80%降至7.66%(62-60毫摩尔/摩尔)。

结论

将财政、组织和教育资源投入到初级保健实践网络中,可以在贫困、种族多样的社区实现糖尿病护理方面具有临床意义的改善。这一成功基于各医疗机构之间的协作、针对性设计的高质量网络绩效信息以及初级和二级保健临床医生之间参与。

相似文献

1
Improving outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes using general practice networks: a quality improvement project in east London.利用全科医疗网络改善2型糖尿病患者的治疗效果:伦敦东部的一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Feb;23(2):171-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002008. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
2
Improving outcomes for people with COPD by developing networks of general practices: evaluation of a quality improvement project in east London.通过建立全科医生网络改善 COPD 患者的结局:东伦敦的一项质量改进项目评估。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 Oct 16;24:14082. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.82.
3
Impact of a social prescribing intervention in North East England on adults with type 2 diabetes: the SPRING_NE multimethod study.英格兰东北部社会处方干预对 2 型糖尿病成人的影响:SPRING_NE 多方法研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Mar;11(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/AQXC8219.
4
Improving cardiovascular disease using managed networks in general practice: an observational study in inner London.利用全科医疗中的管理网络改善心血管疾病:伦敦市中心的一项观察性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 May;64(622):e268-74. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X679697.
5
Improving the management of type 2 diabetes through large-scale general practice: the role of a data-driven and technology-enabled education programme.通过大规模的全科医疗改善 2 型糖尿病管理:数据驱动和技术支持的教育计划的作用。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Feb;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001087.
6
Building managed primary care practice networks to deliver better clinical care: a qualitative semi-structured interview study.构建管理式基层医疗实践网络以提供更好的临床护理:一项定性半结构式访谈研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Nov;67(664):e764-e774. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692597. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
7
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
8
Ethnic disparities in diabetes management and pay-for-performance in the UK: the Wandsworth Prospective Diabetes Study.英国糖尿病管理及按绩效付费中的种族差异:旺兹沃思前瞻性糖尿病研究
PLoS Med. 2007 Jun;4(6):e191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040191.
9
Are there long-term benefits of experiential, interprofessional education for non-specialists on clinical behaviours and outcomes in diabetes care? A cohort study.针对非专科医生开展的体验式跨专业教育对糖尿病护理中的临床行为和结局是否具有长期益处?一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 8;6(1):e009083. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009083.
10
A prospective randomized controlled study of a virtual clinic integrating primary and specialist care for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.一项针对2型糖尿病患者整合初级和专科护理的虚拟诊所的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Diabet Med. 2016 Jun;33(6):768-76. doi: 10.1111/dme.12985. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Customizable Web-Based Dashboard for Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring: Feasibility and Usability Implementation Study.用于远程血压监测的可定制网络仪表盘的开发:可行性与可用性实施研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 6;9:e62700. doi: 10.2196/62700.
2
Healthcare dashboard technologies and data visualization for lipid management: A scoping review.用于脂质管理的医疗保健仪表板技术和数据可视化:范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02730-w.
3
The bigger, the better? A systematic review on the impact of mergers on primary care organizations.
越大越好?关于合并对基层医疗组织影响的系统评价
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;31(2):244-252. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa248.
4
Assessment of Interprofessional Collaborative Practices and Outcomes in Adults With Diabetes and Hypertension in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估初级保健中糖尿病和高血压成人的跨专业协作实践和结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036725. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36725.
5
Socioeconomic status is not associated with the delivery of care in people with diabetes but does modify HbA1c levels: An observational cohort study (Elzha-cohort 1).社会经济地位与糖尿病患者的护理提供无关,但会改变糖化血红蛋白水平:一项观察性队列研究(Elzha 队列 1)。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 May;75(5):e13962. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13962. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
6
Progress in using the electronic health record to improve primary care.利用电子健康记录改善初级保健的进展。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Feb 27;70(692):e215-e220. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X708281. Print 2020 Mar.
7
Cohort Profile: East London Genes & Health (ELGH), a community-based population genomics and health study in British Bangladeshi and British Pakistani people.队列简介:东伦敦基因与健康研究(ELGH),一项针对英国孟加拉裔和英国巴基斯坦裔人群的基于社区的群体基因组学与健康研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 1;49(1):20-21i. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz174.
8
Using chronic kidney disease trigger tools for safety and learning: a qualitative evaluation in East London primary care.使用慢性肾脏病触发工具确保安全和促进学习:东伦敦基层医疗中的定性评估。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Sep 26;69(687):e715-e723. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705497. Print 2019 Oct.
9
Closing Gaps in Diabetes Care: From Evidence to Practice.缩小糖尿病护理差距:从证据到实践。
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2018 May-Aug;6(2):68-76. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_86_17. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
10
An integrated care programme in London: qualitative evaluation.伦敦的一项综合护理计划:定性评估。
J Integr Care (Brighton). 2018;26(4):296-308. doi: 10.1108/JICA-02-2018-0020.